Visibility of an array when less than minimum

Visibility of an array when less than minimum

Anonymous
Not applicable
534 Views
5 Replies
Message 1 of 6

Visibility of an array when less than minimum

Anonymous
Not applicable

This is a very simple block with an A4 cut and folding lines.

There is no problem moving the cut lines in increments of 210 mm one way and 297 mm the other way.

My problem is the folding lines between. They are set as an array with increments at 210 / 297 mm.

They should only be visible between the cut lines, but they are also visible at the last cut lines.

I can solve this by simply drawing cutting lines at all the corners, but is there possibly a more elegant solution.

 

The file is attached.

I am no expert at dynamic blocks so I'll need answers at beginner level 😉 or a link to a tutorial.

 

Udklip.PNG

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
535 Views
5 Replies
Replies (5)
Message 2 of 6

h_s_walker
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

The problem was your linear parameters were too long. eg for the cuts to happen every 210 your first linear parameter needed to be 210 long.

 

See the attached drawing. My block is in green and below yours.

 

 

Howard Walker
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature


Left Handed and Proud

0 Likes
Message 3 of 6

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thank you hwalker!

 

That dos solve my problem with the visibility 🙂

It just leaves me with the problem that I can't go down to the smallest papersizes A4 or A3.

Would that be possible in any way?

0 Likes
Message 4 of 6

Anonymous
Not applicable

My less than elegant solution 😉

 

Udklip.PNG

0 Likes
Message 5 of 6

ojuris
Advisor
Advisor
Accepted solution

try attached file

Message 6 of 6

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thank you ojuris!

 

So the solution was to have to different parameters chained together.

And a visibility setting for the smallest version.

A very convoluted way for a simple block, but very elegant results.

0 Likes