Boring Gaps problem on Corridor code set style hatchings

[Beka_Tchigladze]

Hello people 
I have very boring problem. I am surprised why this level of software  have this type of stupid problem. I am tired already from this problem. there are lots of gaps when I use code set style links hatching on transition between assembles.
does enybody know how to use it not to get a gaps when use code set stule hatching?
thank you

[Beka_Tchigladze]

here is attached screenshot which describes problem, I have posted about this problem several years ago here, but there was no replay unfortunately.

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

please upload the dwg-file so we can see which type of geometry that is and how your code-style sets are defined.

Also please start command _ABOUT and show us a screenshot of that dialog so we know which version of Civil 3D (and Map3D/AutoCAD update) you are using.

- alfred -

[Beka_Tchigladze]

I quickly do it for describing the problem

here are required information

[wfberry]

It is rather obvious that those offsets are in conjunction with the frequency of your corridor.  One rather interesting thing is that your picture shows using a code set style of "mod" (I think) but your submitted drawing is using "#mine".

However, the appearance is the same as far as the offsets.  Changing the frequency of your .dwg eliminates the hatching.

I might add that there are others who can definitely give you a better idea about this.

Bill

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

something is wrong with the file (or maybe my Civil 3D has something not installed you have), but when I change the interval for the corridor I don't get any more hatches at all.

My suggestion would have been to edit the interval for the corridor and change the interval for arcs to dependent from deflection instead of length along curve (sorry, I don't have Civil 3D English installed, so the wording will differ).

- alfred -

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi again,

well, made the intervals now more dense and zoom quite close to one of these open gaps ... looks like that:

The problem seems to be that at the last segment of such an interval 2 parts of that subassembly (the horizontal one and the slope one) have to connect to the border of the existing surface ... and that is close to impossible (please find the read arrows in the screenshot), because the horizontal part can't stay horizontal or the existing ground can not be reached.

So I guess you won't get this done with that one subassembly, maybe some tricks combining subassemblies before reaching the existing ground or decreasing the density.

- alfred -

[Beka_Tchigladze]

So again there is no solution, can anybody tell me what can I do? but how do you all work every time,this corridor hatching are needed to make plot version, or maybe there is other way, how people make hatching if not using code set style. 

[Beka_Tchigladze]

you say that it is fault of my own software I have tried it on several computer. can you do me a very little favour? just please make your own alignment and make some construction with "daylight bench" and try to hatch it is just 15 minute job and make a little high fills and cuts and if it works.

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

>> you say that it is fault of my own software

No, I have not written that and I have not meant that.

Why do you think I thought it's your fault?

The software is Civil 3D, and the problem for that case is a problem that might be solved, but I would not know the theory to solve this ... how would you manually fill this gap?

Can you create a drawing that fills just one of these gaps with triangles? But take care, these triangles need to follow the rules from the subassembly as well as to connect to existing ground. I guess if you try to do this you will find that one of the rules will be lost when you create the triangles ... let's see.

- alfred -

[wfberry]

Use a polyline around the area and hatch it.  It is just a matter of extracting a few polylines.

Bill

[Beka_Tchigladze]

It is what I do usually and it is very boring, I wanted to use software to automate this part of work process but I did not get result. it is very bed I have another software's for road design and they are doing it very well, I am Autodesk fan and I want to use this software well, I want to drop others but, sometimes it seems that civil 3D is not flexible in most parts as other road designing software's, it is not user friendly some times unfortunately needs very very deep learning.