2018 corridors refuse to accept transition alignments

[annw2]

I am starting another corridor in 2018 and again the corridor is refusing to attach transition alignments.  It says it will, then ignores them.

Last time I had to port it back to 2016 to get it to work.

[annw2]

I sent the corridor out to our consultant.

He got the third area in the middle with the sidewalk & basic lane to work.

I tried the first section with the super elevation lanes & just links and they won't attach.

Our guru says that if he selects the corridor and right clicks, it won't work.

I tried that the the select corridor from the tool space and it won't their either.  If I try to right click the corridor, it won't work.

I tried the modify corridor from the top ribbon and that won't work on the first section with the assembly with the super elevation.

[Joe-Bouza]

Hello Anne

Not to bum you out but I just installed 2018 with all the sp's and the targets worked.

If I may ask; what is your work flow for intersections? I've never been able to data ref and do a lock profile

[annw2]

i don't do that many intersections.  When I do I follow the procedures in the Mastering Civil 3d book series.

I haven't had to use the profile locks.  I make sure the intersecting roads agree and back off the cross sections from the intersection.  Then I use alignments along the curb return.

The file is behaving very strangely.

I can easily add the profile targets, but it won't accept the horizontal ones.

[Joe-Bouza]

Have you tried a repair on you install and add the sp's?

sorry if I am making you repeat yourself

[annw2]

I am not allowed to do repairs on our server.  I asked our AutoCAD IT to look at it.  It didn't work on a co-workers computer and our IT is having issues on his computer as well.

When I posted what was installed, the reply back here said that I had the latest install.

What is weird it that it will take the profile target, but not the horizontal.

I also had issues on another 2018 file - that last one I did.  It worked fine in 2016. Bad template?