Dynamic Block with Title Block and Attributes (Not Displaying)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Hi Everyone,
I'm at it again and of course... having issues.
I've created a Dynamic Block with 5 visibility states. Some of which have move parameters contained within them. The visibility states work fine as far as merely cycling between them. However, when I select two of them, some of my attributes don't appear.
Moreover, when I select "Lincoln County (Single Owner) and Lincoln County (Multiple Owners)" the top attributes don't display and populate when entering in values in the other attributes.
I read that sometimes copying attributes and renaming tags can be problematic, so I completely rebuilt my block from scratch with all new attributes. Upon doing this, I created the "Lincoln County" blocks first and they worked perfectly. No issues whatsoever. They cycled fine and all attributes worked as intended.
Next, I added a couple more visibility states with a different title block. That's when things started acting up. Though, within itself (the new block) everything worked (and still does) fine. But, the "Lincoln County" blocks all of a sudden stopped displaying a few of the attributes that worked fine previously. More specifically, the attributes at the very top, named "LINCOLN_TYPE_OF_SURVEY" & "LINCOLN_DESC_OF_SURVEY-1"
Some key things (I believe) that should be noted:
- I've verified that all attributes in question are not invisible
- All tags are named differently from block to block
- Tags in "like-named" visibility states have same Tag names intentionally. This way I can run a LISP that automatically copies values from one to all others with the same name.
- I've reinserted the block approximately 423 times (kidding) to ensure its redefined. Same results.
- I've verified my visible status of each object from state to state and believe they're good to go.
- Locked position is good to go, too.
I'm hoping this is a slight oversight and nothing too complex. Perhaps, the whole "can't see the forest for the trees" saying applies?
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, everyone!