Announcements

Announcement: We’re aware of an issue affecting starting a new topic from category pages and creating new blog posts. New topics can still be started directly from the relevant board. Learn more here.

Need help in creating QH curve for centrifugal pump.

Need help in creating QH curve for centrifugal pump.

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor Contributor
5,757 Views
20 Replies
Message 1 of 21

Need help in creating QH curve for centrifugal pump.

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Dear All,

 I have run one iteration of centrifugal pump assly with impeller successfully by creating surface groups 'Inlet' and 'Outlet'.

I then followed this webinar to plot QH curve using pump automation tool.

But I am getting an error Section 'Outlet 2' missing(Please find attached screenshot). Could you please help me out with it ? I would really appreciate for the help.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
5,758 Views
20 Replies
Replies (20)
Message 2 of 21

Amal.C
Alumni
Alumni
Hi,

Thanks for reaching out to our CFD forum 🙂

I see that you created a group named Outlet2 where you did not assign any surface to it. Can you please delete "Outlet2" by keeping only the two groups "Outlet" and "Inlet" and try launching the automation tool again?

Thanks,
Amal


Amal Cheikh rouhou
0 Likes
Message 3 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Hi Amal,

Thanks for quick response. I tried again by keeping only two surfaces 'Inlet' and 'Outlet'. But still its showing same error. Please find the attached screen shot. Request you to help what's going wrong with it.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 21

Amal.C
Alumni
Alumni

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

Thanks for your feedback!

 

After removing "Outlet2" from the Goups tree:

  • did you make sure to delete all the previously automatically generated scenarios and start over the process from only one scenario?
  • Did you re-start the CFD program?  

If yes, then I suggest that you share with me your support file so that I check for you where the issue is? 

 

Thanks,

Amal



Amal Cheikh rouhou
0 Likes
Message 5 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Hi @Amal.C ,

  Yes I created the simulation from scratch again.  Today I again tried with the tutorial file provided. But I am facing the same problem again. I am attaching the support file for your review. I really appreciate your response. Will be awaiting for the solution.

  Regarding the first result that I had run, The pressure is increasing upto 50 time step during ramp up. But it then drops for some iterations and then becomes stable.(I am not able to understand why its happening Please find attached screenshot for your reference)

0 Likes
Message 6 of 21

Amal.C
Alumni
Alumni

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

I will take a look at your file and let you know 😉

 

Thanks for sharing it with me!

 

Amal



Amal Cheikh rouhou
0 Likes
Message 7 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Hi @Amal.C,

  Did you get chance to review the file which I submitted ?

Please let me know if you require any furthur information related to it.


0 Likes
Message 8 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni

Hello @vyas.harsh.d,

 

I am attempting to recreate your issue however the tutorial based scenario that you sent runs fine on my machine. 

 

To clarify, are you receiving the same "Section 'Outlet 2' does not exist" error when running the tutorial based simulation?

 

Also, which CFD version are you using?

 

Regarding your query over the pressure residuals plot, it looks fairly characteristic of a ramp up and settle out. 

 

Thanks,

David


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
0 Likes
Message 9 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Hi @David.Short.,

 Thank you for the response. One scenario runs fine with me too. But I am getting error when I am trying to generate Q-H curve using addin.

Yes I am getting the same error "Section 'Outlet 2' does not exist" while running the simulation in tutorial file. I am using AUTODESK CFD 2017 version.

Also could you explain what does this error mean? 
"Section 'Outlet 2' does not exist" 

0 Likes
Message 10 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

Firstly when using the pump addin don't apply boundary conditions as the addin will take care of this for you.

 

Here is the documentation regarding usage of the pump simulation tool.

 

I am fairly sure that the error you are receiving is still due to some dependents created when you made the 'Outlet 2' group by accident. Please try closing CFD and then import the geometry again and see if the error persists.

 

I hope this helps. 

 

All the best,

David

 


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
0 Likes
Message 11 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Hi @David.Short.,

   Don't apply boundary conditions ? But before using addin you need to run one case successfully for addin to work.

The link of the document is not working properly. Could you please share the link to document again ?

 

I did the above simulation from scratch i.e. new from beginning (Using native CAD file) discarding the older one. I didn't add surface 'Outlet 2' group in the file which I have submitted above for your review.

Adding to above points I tried again without adding any groups to the simulation. the first one ran successfully but the addin is showing same error for other 10 results which are run. (please find attached image screenshot for details)

I would like to ask are you able to plot Q-H curve using addin ?

Could you please share your detailed process while using addin ? (Using screenshots ?)

This would help me more where I am making mistakes.

0 Likes
Message 12 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

Really sorry about the faulty link. Here it is again.

 

Or here: https://apps.autodesk.com/SCFD/en/Detail/HelpDoc?appId=3576057998749906699&appLang=en&os=Win32_64

 

The "Outlet 2" error is certainly a strange one. I will do some digging!

 

Thanks,

David 


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
0 Likes
Message 13 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

How are you getting on with your project?

 

I am unfortunately still none the wiser regarding your "outlet 2" error but I am almost sure it must be due to dependents remaining (maybe linked to the API) from when you accidentally created two outlet groups. Are you sure that you've started completely from fresh with the design study?

 

Thanks a lot,

David


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
0 Likes
Message 14 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Good Day @David.Short.,

  I am attaching a file which shows detailed information of what steps I am following. Today I started the simulation from scratch with loading up new CAD tutorial assembly. Request you to look into it and let me know on which step I am missing out.

0 Likes
Message 15 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni

Good afternoon @vyas.harsh.d,

 

Thanks a lot for giving such clear instructions such that i could follow your workflow!

 

I repeated your process and got the same error to my surprise, so sorry for doubting you, it was just a crazy coincidence that you had created an "outlet 2" previously!! 

 

I think I have also found the cause. When creating your groups you must deselect all after creating your inlet as if you don't you assign the outlet to the inlet again (hope that makes sense). You then have two surfaces as outlet hence the error. Please try creating your groups again ensuring only one surface per group.

 

Thanks,

David


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
0 Likes
Message 16 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Hi @David.Short.,

Thank you for your response.


 I had noticed that in my previous simulation trials. But I did took care of it since then. In this file you can see in point no. 10 and no. 11 Screenshots. I have defined only single surface for each 'Inlet' and 'Outlet'. I took utmost care that two surface are not selected in a single group.

Request you to re look at it.

Also could you post a workflow of yours in which Q-H Curve is plotted at the end using the addin tool ? So I might get idea where I am making the mistake ?

Again Thank you very much for your efforts.

0 Likes
Message 17 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni
Accepted solution

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

Ok I see you have created groups correctly. I have followed suit and like you get the same "Outlet 2" error.

 

Here is how to avoid it (hopefully):

 

Don't run scenario 1 until you have setup the other scenarios with the Pump API.

 

Don't assign boundary conditions to your scenario one. As I have said in previous posts the Pump API creates them for you. Set the GPM value (Gallons per minute mass flow rate) to equal your intended mass flow rate BC (60kg/min =~ 16GPM).

 

Don't touch the time step or number of steps as again the Pump API will handle it using your specified number of blades, degree increments and desired revolutions.

 

I have attached a screenshot of the values I have used in the pump API and a .cfz file with a setup which should result in a pump curve after each scenario has been solved and the "Process data" function has been used.

 

I hope this solves your issue.

 

All the best and have a good weekend,

David

 

 

 


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
Message 18 of 21

vyas.harsh.d
Contributor
Contributor

Dear @David.Short.,

 Thank you so much for digging out the error. I think now its working. I missed the point about ' not defining the boundary conditions in the beginning". I am currently running the simulations . Lets see how it goes.

By the way if we are not defining the boundary conditions then how does it take the direction of the flow rate at the outlet ?

Again thank you very much for the help. It made sense a lot. Will come back to you if there is any issue further.

0 Likes
Message 19 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

I'm glad that you are now making some progress. The outlet flow direction will be defined by the direction of rotation of the impeller.

 

Thanks a lot,

David


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
0 Likes
Message 20 of 21

David.Short.
Alumni
Alumni

Hi @vyas.harsh.d,

 

I would like to follow up on this thread. 

 

If you think that I or another contributor have answered your question / solved your problem please can you mark the relevant post as an accepted solution, alternatively you can allow me to mark it as such. This will help others to benefit from the discussion and easily find the solution if they have a similar issue.

 

Thanks a lot,

David


David Short
Technical Support Specialist, Simulation
0 Likes