Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
My idea is that you should be able to assign an issue to multiple users/roles/companies (in any combination of them) Now, you can only select one individual, one role or one company.
For me this is necessary when an issue needs to be solved by 2 or more subcontractors
agreed super critical, issues can affect two disciplines or multiple draftees are on a project or both engineer and draftee need to be involved in reviewing. assigning company and roles doe not work with big projects.
yep need this. maybe issues can be assigned to one person or company and then assign someone to "follow" the issue. that way one person or company knows they are the ones responsible for resolving the issue and the person following is there to help or just "be in the know."
How is this not currently implemented? You have an issue, multiple parties are involved in addressing it, that could be companies, roles or individuals. That could execute either with teams working on the task concurrently (typical in design), or sequentially (typical in construction), perhaps even a mixture of both. All if this should be available.
It will be interesting if you're able to assign just to one person too, although many other people are with permission to create/view. In my case just one person will be responsible to the receive the requests and then redirect to the responsible disciplines. But when i click to assign the Issue to someone, everyone on the project is able to me to assign.
I think it's the opposite of this publication but it's my case... I think there's not a solution for that too.
This should have been a default feature available in the first place. Now customers are raising this issue and not yet implemented after more than 2 years?
Totally agree with this. Hope this gets implemented soon. Also, I hope that there is an added feature where you can link an issue to another issue. Because sometimes, an issue is a result of not having to solve the other issue (domino effect).
This is a must, I get this requested constantly and project members get quite disappointed when they are told such a basic thing cannot be done in BIM 360, so please, make it happen
The ability to assign multiple people to an issue is critical for this tool to be useful. This should be resolved asap. I need to be able to assign the issue to a CAD Designer, a Project Manager, and a vendor all in one issue for this tool to be really effective.
This function should have been there from the beginning! It can't be that hard to program. I see it more as a conceptual bug rather than a missing functionality. It's very hard to convince other firms to use IMS on BIM 360 if it even doesn't support the basic concepts. It's clear the develop managers are missing connection with the field. Just open a free account off Bimtrack or Bimcollab and you will notice immediately what to do to make it a bit mature. Please focus to get at least one mature planform instead 2 primitives!
"It's clear the develop managers are missing connection with the field. Just open a free account off Bimtrack or Bimcollab and you will notice immediately what to do to make it a bit mature."
I couldn't agree more with your statement @JensDeSmedt
@Anonymous: Can you please provide a statement regarding this critical issue (having multi-user assignee option). Are you going to implement this? Is this on the roadmap somewhere? I don't know what is more discomforting: the fact that we don't receive a reaction from your organization on this thread or the fact that none of your engineers came up with this simple idea in the first place. Meanwhile I, as BIM manager, have great difficulty convincing people in the office that we should implement BIM 360 workflows. When this issue surfaces I simply get laughed away and with good reason.
The tagging functionality would be helpful and go a long way in solving the issue if you actually would be able to see and filter on the tagged users in the issue list/table. Now the tagging only serves as a simple notification of the issue to the tagged person which then gets lost in the activity track. There is no possibility to actually see which users are tagged on which issues in a coherent comprehensive view such as the issue list/table. So a tagged user a week after the tagging happened has no way whatsoever to identify then on which issues he was tagged on.
