@bibleje wrote:
I do agree with that premise that they may need more but I think the second line in the comparison tells the tale. $460/yr vs $1865/yr. Over 4x difference. This is their first exposure to CAD so I think they are just being cautious in seeing the ROI for the product. Thank you for your input.
A common misconception for sure.
Quick recap:
LT, @ $460/yr, is a general use CAD program that does not specialize in much of anything related to any industry (or much of any specialty that you listed as your intent) and repetitive tasks and serious automation is limited. It's great to use when your only concern is bottom line cost that does not factor in efficiencies of drafting.
AutoCAD, @ $1865/yr, give you not only access to 3rd party addons that would make your P&ID workload possibly lighter, you also get access to 30+ years of free LISP /VBA customizations that just making drafting and repetitive tasks way more automated.
PLUS you get to use all the other 6 variants of AutoCAD for free when you need them, and a Raster toolset, including but not limited to AutoCAD Plant3D which has P&ID abilities built in. That's 7 separate software packages.
So... "mainly P&IDs" to some folks means using the correct tool, short term costs can be easily compensated for with efficient use of time drafting (aka more billable hours or better use of time on fixed-bid projects). To others its nothing more than electronic pen/paper drafting, upfront cost is the only driving reason.
Choose wisely. You got this.
HTH