- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
To start off, I'm running AutoCAD 2018 Windows 10.
I frequently use a range of hatching patterns in roadway design and I find the extremely useful for generating quantities that can be used in cost estimates. I'm working for a private municipal engineering firm that deals with dozens of different cities, and each one seems to have their own standard practices, which in this case includes using their specified hatching patterns for different street surfaces.
For years now, our firm has used a custom hatch that we received from one particular municipality, but no one here has ever successfully imported it into our hatch library. A number of us have had our try at it, and all attempts have been unsuccessful. What we're left doing is essentially copying/pasting the pattern, and adjusting the boundaries to the appropriate area. This is absolutely not a problem, but relative to boundary hatching it's a huge pain. I've done plenty of research on creating new hatch patterns and applying them with the Super Hatch function, but again relative to Boundary Hatching, it's painfully slow and inefficient.
Does AutoDesk have any plans on streamlining the process of custom hatch generation?
As far as I can tell, the following article describes the only way someone can create their own hatch pattern:
It boggles my mind that AutoCAD can be as sophisticated as it currently is, and still require this cryptic, and extremely inconvenient means of hatch generation. Am I missing something here, or is this really the best that AutoCAD can do?
One possible workaround that I've also been unsuccessful in figuring out, is importing the text-file code (described in the link above) for a user-defined block. When I create a block, does it also create a text file with the same formatting that I can just copy into the hatch pattern text file? It just seems ridiculous to take the time to learn how to code using the text file formatting described in the link above.
Thanks for the help,
JH
Solved! Go to Solution.