Amy,
I would think there could be 2 versions of the drawings as well. However, I am ordered to find a way to display all attributes and symbols in one drawing, then different departments can hide/unhide symbols as they see fit. The issue with layers is that the CT's are no longer affiliated with a specific breaker. What I need is, say, Breaker 155-555 has 4 exclusive CT's, and the Excel report should reflect that. I doubt layers could achieve that objective.
As for location and installation codes, I wonder if it is okay to use a CT symbol that doesn't have any connection terminals. Because the CT's are not connected to the circuits, they are wrapped around the wires to detect fault currents and then trip the breakers. If AutoCAD allows me to drop in CT symbols without connecting wires, just leave them dangling; then perhaps I could use the location and installation codes to associate the CT's with the specific breaker, by doing that the Excel report should reflect the CT's affiliated with a breaker.
As a matter of fact, we already have the drawings in plain AutoCAD with different layers. But none of the CT and breaker association would be shown if an Excel report is extracted from a plain AutoCAD. That's why I am converting the AutoCAD drawings into AutoCAD electrical, trying to link up the symbol association.
I know I probably not explain very well. I never dealt with high voltage stuff before. I used to only work on PLCs. Also, I am the ONLY AutoCAD electrical user in my company. So, I am on my own now💩.
sincerely,
Paul