So I noticed...
I was saying that modifying the entries that way only requires the one edit, after that it would all be automatic.
The Assemblycode value being used for your companies part numbers will cause the lookup to be slower than it should be.
What happens is that ACADE will detect the value and then search the entire table for a matching entry in the Assemblylist entry.
What needs to be done is all those part numbers to be moved to the three User entries. This will speed up the catalogue lookup as ACADE is no longer doing a search for those Assemblylist values on every component you lookup.
The other thing is that the Assemblycode and Assemblylist values are not available in reports whereas the USER? values can be.
This means that if you want a BOM to show your part number, you will have to either enter it manually each time or move it to a section that does show in reports like the USER# entries.
As for the fuse holder picking up the RATING1=??A Textvalue entry in the fuse and forcing that into the schematic block, I don't think that can be done.
At least, I've never heard of it being done. The only way for it to work is to have the textvalue entry in the fuse holder. this would then require multiple entries for the different fuse holders/fuse combinations and would almost double the size of that fuse table.
It's better to assign the fuse to the schematic component as multiple fuses can call the same fuse holder with no problems and only one entry for each type of fuse holder.
Regards Brad
>
Brad Coleman, Electrical Draftsman
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.