AutoCAD Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s AutoCAD Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular AutoCAD Architecture topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Time for a change?

11 REPLIES 11
Reply
Message 1 of 12
Anonymous
740 Views, 11 Replies

Time for a change?

Time for new hardware, thinking of moving to a mac.
Longtime acad /ADT user, but haven't been active for the past couple of years. Just now doing the 2007 Tutorials.
Question, I'm interested rapid prototyping for architecture.....should I stick with the soon to be new Architecture 2008 or be thinking to move to Revit?.....or something else?

Anyone have any thoughts?
11 REPLIES 11
Message 2 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

"...thinking of moving to a mac..."

Dumbest idea you'll ever have in your professional life if
you are even serious about REVIT or Architectural2008 or
ADT2007 or AutoCAD2007.

If you want a MAC, buy a CAD package designed for the
platform. No such product in Autodesk's lineup.

--
Dean Saadallah
Add-on products for LT
http://www.pendean.com/lt
--
Message 3 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Why.......Mac now has the intel chip?
Could run parallels and / or bootcamp.
Also ........forgot to mention I'm into doing movies.

Not sure if Maya is an option for .stl files.

Any more comments, even if I'm a dumb professional?
Message 4 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Can I ask, .. what is " rapid prototyping for architecture..." ???
Do you mean creating scale 3D models from the BIM model? I think that both
programs could serve that requirement for 3D models. Both support IFC
output. You might have to work backward from the model output device/3D
printer and see what software output is supported for best integration and
make choices from there.
good luck,
--
Kevin Anderson
www.KAddAssociates.com
Message 5 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Kevin:
"Do you mean creating scale 3D models.......?"
Yeah, that's what I'd like to look into.
I'm not sure which one is a better fit.

Thanks.
Message 6 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

What you really want to do is buy hardware supporting your primary programs.
If your doing a lot video editing, Mac is a good choice. If your primarily
doing AutoCAD, PC is a better way to go. You're wanting to do both on a Mac.
I haven't used AutoCAD on a Mac, but I hear a lot of people are doing that.
All I can say is it is possible, but I don't know how the performance
compares.
Mark

wrote in message news:5514031@discussion.autodesk.com...
Why.......Mac now has the intel chip?
Could run parallels and / or bootcamp.
Also ........forgot to mention I'm into doing movies.

Not sure if Maya is an option for .stl files.

Any more comments, even if I'm a dumb professional?
Message 7 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

mittie wrote:
> Why.......Mac now has the intel chip?

Because this would be running it in an incompatible environment. The Mac
OS is great; but it cannot run these products compiled for the Windows
operating system.

> Could run parallels and / or bootcamp.

Well that's untested and not supported at this time. While it may work
for you; you may also experience Licensing or Activation issues in this
setup that Autodesk cannot address effectively as it depends on the
behavior of bootcamp or parallels.

--
David Kurtz
Autodesk Support
Manchester, NH
Message 8 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Perhaps, but it may be able to work. Phil Read, a noted Revit expert (perhaps the #1 Guru) and Autodesk employee runs the program typically on his Mac. A nice long discussion happened over on AUGI.

http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=35939&highlight=Revit+Mac

Being not tested is a good reason to not jump ship immediately, but it may work too. I'd wait it out a couple months and let the early testers get their say before making a decision. Message was edited by: BrianMyers
Message 9 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Thanks for the feedback guys & gals,

Brian........yeah I went over to AUGI and read alot of poop on the subject.

I'm really wondering about stlout for generating *.stl files. From my very limited understanding of revit .........it does not have that file export capability.

Sitting on the fence, is something I just might have to do. Thks for your view.
Message 10 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

BrianMyers wrote:
> Perhaps, but it may be able to work. Phil Read, a noted Revit expert (perhaps the #1 Guru) and Autodesk employee runs the program typically on his Mac.

Yes, I know Phil's been doing this for some time (just saw him at OTC,
Hi Phil!) and have talked to him about this a bit. I hope to soon get a
description of the exact setup and spec's from him so that we can better
understand his configuration.

Still, if you contact Autodesk officially, we may not be able to give
you any support on this platform as QA runs no tests in this environment
at this time. (Read: do it at your own risk.)

--
David Kurtz
Autodesk Support
Manchester, NH
Message 11 of 12
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

In a related article:

http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/2007/03/run_autocad_200.html
Message 12 of 12
tomislav_zigo
in reply to: Anonymous

Just to chime in on RP and current apps. In 1997 we have produce entire Lafayette Square in St. Louis as an RP kit of parts for an architectural charette using Stereo lithography as at that time the only viable process from the resolution point of view. Models were created in Form Z and AutoCAD R14, and what become evident immediately is the problem of relative scaling and cost of material. In order to use a BIM model without an additional tweaking (a lot of tweaking) one should try to create a SLA or FDM model that is composed of several components so that there is enough thickness (meat) in physical model to support itself.
For example, when creating a curtain wall with SLA or FDM at 1/8 scale, which is quite a large scale for an architectural model, if a large structure is in question, 1” glazing needs to be printed as 0.01” thick layer of material and considering that the horizontal layer resolution on a very good quality SLA machine (read as expensive) is 0.005”, most often the entire building envelope ends up looking as fabric ruined by moths. With FDM the problem is even more pronounced, to the extend that exterior walls integrity might get compromised. From that perspective, a multi segmented large model where parts get assembled, or a solid model are the best options for the direct BIM model translation.
The bigger problem is finding a client that is willing to pay for it, but that would be another topic.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report