The dimensions you posted do not quite add up correctly. I made a brief Screencast to show one way the exterior Walls could be laid out, using AutoCAD Architecture 2016. The procedure in 2017 can be exactly the same, or, for the initial placement, you could choose to use the new CReate type command option to place the Walls by defining a rectangle. I based the video on the following:
Standard Style Walls (variable width) were used, with an initial width of 9".
Overall dimensions: 226'-10" left to right; 75'-10" front to back.
Wall thicknesses (final):
- 9" at the left and right sides (yielding a clear interior dimension of 225'-4".
- 1'-1" at the front and back (yielding a clear interior dimension of 73'-8".
If your actual dimensions are different, you can still use the techniques shown to achieve the result you need.
For an initial quick study, use of the single-component, variable-width Standard Wall Style is appropriate, as you will not get bogged down in creating specific Wall Styles at a point where getting the overall width is all you need. Since the exterior dimensions were the primary givens, I used left-justified Walls drawn in a clockwise direction to place the justification line at the exterior face of Wall. That way, any later changes to the Wall width will not affect the given exterior dimensions. Later on, if you develop specific, multi-component Wall Styles for the exterior Walls, you can simply change the Wall Style of each Wall in the Properties palette to swap in the new styles, and the Left justification will hold the exterior dimensions. [Prefer drawing counterclockwise? Use Right justification.]
One quick note about using ACA "Standard" styles for any style-based object type. ACA has definitions for these embedded in the program code, and, when using a drawing not previously edited in ACA (such as one received from an outside source, done in vanilla AutoCAD), ACA will generate the Standard Style for a given object type when the "add" command for that type is executed. If you ever decide to make changes to the out-of-the-box display settings for that object type (or for Material Definitions), I would recommend creating your own "Standard" styles, under a different name (perhaps by using your company's name or initials as a prefix or suffix). That way you can apply your changes to your "company Standard" style and not have to worry that ACA will generate a Standard style that does not have those changes.
The attached file is the file used to create the Screencast.
David Koch
AutoCAD Architecture and Revit User
Blog | LinkedIn
