Advance Steel Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Advance Steel Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Advance Steel topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Missing items in IFC export

11 REPLIES 11
Reply
Message 1 of 12
pedruccioli
687 Views, 11 Replies

Missing items in IFC export

pedruccioli
Advocate
Advocate

We are giving a shot to Advance Steel, but struggling with interoperability in IFC format. Models made in Tekla never presented any issue.

 

When exporting as IFC 2x3, we have bolts, but no C-Section profiles in Navisworks, while in BIMVision the C-Section appears, but no bolts:

pedruccioli_1-1709129004442.png

pedruccioli_2-1709129059200.png

When exporting as MVD EM .11, bolts become lines, some other elements disappear, and still no C-section profiles in Navis. Still no bolts, same elements disappears, and C-Sections shows in BIMVision:

pedruccioli_0-1709128858866.png

pedruccioli_3-1709129194047.png

From everything we've read on the forum, we tried creating a series of beams using different methods, and no C-Section are imported in Navis, while all are in BIMVision (even then, the reinforcements don't appear):

pedruccioli_5-1709130249876.png

 

pedruccioli_4-1709130222097.png

We must be doing something wrong, because makes no sense that a raw export wouldn't be perfect inside Autodesk environment.

 

Does anyone have a suggestion?

 

PS: We tried direct export to Navis, and the result is the same.

Architecture Modelling, BIM Workflows and Information Exchange.
LinkedIn
0 Likes

Missing items in IFC export

We are giving a shot to Advance Steel, but struggling with interoperability in IFC format. Models made in Tekla never presented any issue.

 

When exporting as IFC 2x3, we have bolts, but no C-Section profiles in Navisworks, while in BIMVision the C-Section appears, but no bolts:

pedruccioli_1-1709129004442.png

pedruccioli_2-1709129059200.png

When exporting as MVD EM .11, bolts become lines, some other elements disappear, and still no C-section profiles in Navis. Still no bolts, same elements disappears, and C-Sections shows in BIMVision:

pedruccioli_0-1709128858866.png

pedruccioli_3-1709129194047.png

From everything we've read on the forum, we tried creating a series of beams using different methods, and no C-Section are imported in Navis, while all are in BIMVision (even then, the reinforcements don't appear):

pedruccioli_5-1709130249876.png

 

pedruccioli_4-1709130222097.png

We must be doing something wrong, because makes no sense that a raw export wouldn't be perfect inside Autodesk environment.

 

Does anyone have a suggestion?

 

PS: We tried direct export to Navis, and the result is the same.

Architecture Modelling, BIM Workflows and Information Exchange.
LinkedIn
11 REPLIES 11
Message 2 of 12

Sebastian_Eiche
Mentor
Mentor

Version of Advance Steel? Original sections from the database or user profiles? 
If you load the ifc in bimvision and the C-sections are seen, it should be not problem of Advance Steel..this is a problem of navisworks or not?


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

0 Likes

Version of Advance Steel? Original sections from the database or user profiles? 
If you load the ifc in bimvision and the C-sections are seen, it should be not problem of Advance Steel..this is a problem of navisworks or not?


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Message 3 of 12

pedruccioli
Advocate
Advocate

AS 2024, and the sections are OOTB.
It kinda makes sense, but as I mentioned, the native "Export to Navisworks" gives the same result, so it isn't just an IFC thing.

 

If I open a model made of the "same" parts in Tekla, they all show in Navis. So it should be something with AS. Here's the IFC of a sample model from Tekla:

pedruccioli_0-1709138295704.png

 

Architecture Modelling, BIM Workflows and Information Exchange.
LinkedIn
0 Likes

AS 2024, and the sections are OOTB.
It kinda makes sense, but as I mentioned, the native "Export to Navisworks" gives the same result, so it isn't just an IFC thing.

 

If I open a model made of the "same" parts in Tekla, they all show in Navis. So it should be something with AS. Here's the IFC of a sample model from Tekla:

pedruccioli_0-1709138295704.png

 

Architecture Modelling, BIM Workflows and Information Exchange.
LinkedIn
Message 4 of 12

Sebastian_Eiche
Mentor
Mentor

If you don't see objects in navisworks but in other viewer, why should this be a problem of Advance Steel? The navisworks export is just a 3d DWF this is not a native export.

And the comparison with Tekla is just say nothing... Tekla use other native objects, other exports...so why should we compare these files? The objects of Advance Steel are written in the files but navisworks could not show them. Could you upload your ICF file test from Advance Steel? 

Which version of navisworks do you use?


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

0 Likes

If you don't see objects in navisworks but in other viewer, why should this be a problem of Advance Steel? The navisworks export is just a 3d DWF this is not a native export.

And the comparison with Tekla is just say nothing... Tekla use other native objects, other exports...so why should we compare these files? The objects of Advance Steel are written in the files but navisworks could not show them. Could you upload your ICF file test from Advance Steel? 

Which version of navisworks do you use?


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Message 5 of 12

sdonohoedesign
Collaborator
Collaborator
Hi @pedruccioli

There are issues with the in-built IFC export in Advance Steel. I was never able to get it to re-create all but the most basic models. 9/10 times the IFC models had similar issues to yours, even when uploaded to Autodesk Viewer. Autodesk know their software doesn't work with IFC hence their push towards Revit.

Most of us who need IFC use alternative methods of converting our models.
Many will use the .smlx export to Revit
I explode to ACIS and use BricsCAD BIM to export IFC
There is even a very pioneering expert from down under who has built his own export tool......
0 Likes

Hi @pedruccioli

There are issues with the in-built IFC export in Advance Steel. I was never able to get it to re-create all but the most basic models. 9/10 times the IFC models had similar issues to yours, even when uploaded to Autodesk Viewer. Autodesk know their software doesn't work with IFC hence their push towards Revit.

Most of us who need IFC use alternative methods of converting our models.
Many will use the .smlx export to Revit
I explode to ACIS and use BricsCAD BIM to export IFC
There is even a very pioneering expert from down under who has built his own export tool......
Message 6 of 12

Sebastian_Eiche
Mentor
Mentor

Sorry but this is wrong.
There were issues in the past, but by exporting IFC files out of Advance Steel since the last 2-3 Years, had not so many errors.

Advance only export specific objects, that is correct, so you will not get an AutoCAD Line or something like that. 

But as I know there should be no problem with AS object which are included in the out of the box databases.


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

0 Likes

Sorry but this is wrong.
There were issues in the past, but by exporting IFC files out of Advance Steel since the last 2-3 Years, had not so many errors.

Advance only export specific objects, that is correct, so you will not get an AutoCAD Line or something like that. 

But as I know there should be no problem with AS object which are included in the out of the box databases.


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Message 7 of 12

Sebastian_Eiche
Mentor
Mentor

I tested it:
AS2024 - Navisworks 2024 --> Navisworks DWF:

Sebastian_Eiche_0-1709203288517.png


But the IFC is not shown. I have a look in the IFC file itself. The C-section is there, so the navisworks has a problem by showing it.
By using a viewer the ifc is correct:

Sebastian_Eiche_1-1709203736103.png

 

different viewer:
 

Sebastian_Eiche_2-1709203817493.png

 

I opened the file in Revit:

 

Sebastian_Eiche_3-1709204115663.png



maybe @Emanuel.Nestor could have a look and could give a few more information


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

I tested it:
AS2024 - Navisworks 2024 --> Navisworks DWF:

Sebastian_Eiche_0-1709203288517.png


But the IFC is not shown. I have a look in the IFC file itself. The C-section is there, so the navisworks has a problem by showing it.
By using a viewer the ifc is correct:

Sebastian_Eiche_1-1709203736103.png

 

different viewer:
 

Sebastian_Eiche_2-1709203817493.png

 

I opened the file in Revit:

 

Sebastian_Eiche_3-1709204115663.png



maybe @Emanuel.Nestor could have a look and could give a few more information


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Message 8 of 12

Emanuel.Nestor
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @Sebastian_Eiche,

I just ran a test on my side, and the C profiles are correctly shown in Navis Manage 2024.

Please see the attached test model, IFC 2x3, IFC MVD, and DWF files.

Here is the image from Navis after appending all of them:

EmanuelNestor_0-1709308948100.png

Do I miss something?

 

Best regards,
Emy



Emy Nestor

Hi @Sebastian_Eiche,

I just ran a test on my side, and the C profiles are correctly shown in Navis Manage 2024.

Please see the attached test model, IFC 2x3, IFC MVD, and DWF files.

Here is the image from Navis after appending all of them:

EmanuelNestor_0-1709308948100.png

Do I miss something?

 

Best regards,
Emy



Emy Nestor
Message 9 of 12

Sebastian_Eiche
Mentor
Mentor

Hi Emy,

 

sorry for my late answer. I'm doing something wrong...

 

Export as IFC 2x3

Sebastian_Eiche_3-1711093095770.png

 

 

Import in Navisworks:

Sebastian_Eiche_1-1711092957566.png

 

Sebastian_Eiche_2-1711093058345.png

 

I attach you my ifc


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

0 Likes

Hi Emy,

 

sorry for my late answer. I'm doing something wrong...

 

Export as IFC 2x3

Sebastian_Eiche_3-1711093095770.png

 

 

Import in Navisworks:

Sebastian_Eiche_1-1711092957566.png

 

Sebastian_Eiche_2-1711093058345.png

 

I attach you my ifc


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Message 10 of 12

Sebastian_Eiche
Mentor
Mentor

additional: If I load your IFC file into my navisworks...the result ic complete another as it should be
I know there're C- Profiles...but Navis show me a HEA100 and a UPN260

Sebastian_Eiche_0-1711093450312.png



I'm a bit confused 🙂


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

0 Likes

additional: If I load your IFC file into my navisworks...the result ic complete another as it should be
I know there're C- Profiles...but Navis show me a HEA100 and a UPN260

Sebastian_Eiche_0-1711093450312.png



I'm a bit confused 🙂


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Message 11 of 12

Emanuel.Nestor
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @Sebastian_Eiche,

First, the IFC file itself is correct. I can import it back into Advance Steel, read it with "Open IFC Viewer" --> all good.

So, it seems that "something" is happening on the Naviswork's side.

There are multiple settings in Navisworks related to IFC.

An important one is the "Conversion method" set for IFC:

EmanuelNestor_0-1711106634348.png

(On my side, I am using the "Legacy").

Which one do you use?

Also, do you have "IFC for Revit 2024" installed on your side? If yes, which one?

(https://github.com/Autodesk/revit-ifc/releases)

 

Best regards,

Emy



Emy Nestor

Hi @Sebastian_Eiche,

First, the IFC file itself is correct. I can import it back into Advance Steel, read it with "Open IFC Viewer" --> all good.

So, it seems that "something" is happening on the Naviswork's side.

There are multiple settings in Navisworks related to IFC.

An important one is the "Conversion method" set for IFC:

EmanuelNestor_0-1711106634348.png

(On my side, I am using the "Legacy").

Which one do you use?

Also, do you have "IFC for Revit 2024" installed on your side? If yes, which one?

(https://github.com/Autodesk/revit-ifc/releases)

 

Best regards,

Emy



Emy Nestor
Message 12 of 12

Sebastian_Eiche
Mentor
Mentor

Hi,

 

the conversation method was the point.
I never changed this as I Know. In germany this is called :

Sebastian_Eiche_0-1711107132520.png

Which could be translated to:

  1. "older version"
  2. modern
  3. v3

So "older" version sounds not good to the most users =).
But now it works and maybe this is a setting which helps others


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Hi,

 

the conversation method was the point.
I never changed this as I Know. In germany this is called :

Sebastian_Eiche_0-1711107132520.png

Which could be translated to:

  1. "older version"
  2. modern
  3. v3

So "older" version sounds not good to the most users =).
But now it works and maybe this is a setting which helps others


Sebastian Eiche
Application Engineer @Mensch und Maschine acadGraph

EESignature

If this information was helpful, please use the Accept as Solution function, this make it easier for other users

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report