ACC Build - Allow Customisable Statuses in Issues

[jackson_morleyVSQVR]

Allow the creation of customisable statues in issues. This would allow for more effective filtering and exports if required.

For example, if something is actioned to the client who is not an ACC member and I can set the status to "with client" I can then filter for discussion in meetings and export only the relevant items if required.

[浦川 崇]

I'd like to ask a question about your proposal.
Does this proposal include the customization of default status for review comments by the users?

[jackson_morleyVSQVR]

Yes, that is correct. Exactly like what can be done for assets Statuses. 

[浦川 崇]

Thank you for your response.
I agree with your proposal.

[HGC-Jchandler]

Allowing admins to modify status names & descriptions would simplify the process of responding to issues. The current descriptions are OK but don't apply to many scenarios. 

Current workflow - a detailer/modeler is assigned an issue and they need to flag it as something that needs to be discussed during the next meeting. They could choose "Pending" but who knows what that means. 

Proposed workflow - "Pending" is changed to "Review in Meeting", and its now clear to everyone involved what action needs to take place. 

[Michael-Mair]

To maintain the 9 main statuses of ACC and enable company-wide evaluations, it would be useful to add sub-statuses to the respective main statuses individually for each project. This would allow defining multiple "Pending" statuses that can be quickly filtered within the project, while still clearly indicating that all these tasks belong to the main status "Pending" across the entire company group.

[annika.kirsch]

This would be also helpful for us. Sometimes the german translations of the status are not good. We also need additional status with the client