Community
3ds Max Shading, Lighting and Rendering
Welcome to Autodesk’s 3ds Max Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular 3ds Max materials topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Arnold render extremely slow & Grainy

18 REPLIES 18
Reply
Message 1 of 19
LiamBM
9153 Views, 18 Replies

Arnold render extremely slow & Grainy

Hi guys,

 

I've decided to render one of my old mental ray scenes using arnold lighting to see if I could get a nicer render, however arnold has been nothing but a pain. The render times are extremely long, and the results are horrific. Am I doing something wrong? The lighting setup is the same as my mental ray scene, which is a sky light, and portal lights at each window (i don't want any lights inside the room). I've played around with samples, but i'm already at 1 hour render times, and the grain is still extremely bad (renders below). Why are my results so much cleaner in mental ray and faster to render?

 

I've attached both my mental ray and arnold renders down below. I'd love to know if I've completely missed a trick somewhere. ps, i've also tried noise reduction, but the quality is far from amazing. Smiley Sad

 

using 3ds max 2018

18 REPLIES 18
Message 2 of 19
leeminardi
in reply to: LiamBM

I'm new to Arnold but have found using Arnold lights and not Photometric lights to be very important.  E.g., use a Skydome Arnold light  as described here and get rid of your old lights.  The tutorial also has some suggestion for Intensity and Exposure settings which greatly affect rendering quality and speed.

lee.minardi
Message 3 of 19
madsd
in reply to: LiamBM

I Just made a test on some random Vray scene I converted to Arnold.

 

- resolution is 5000x3000.

- 1 skylight, no portals, no tweaking, no custom settings.

- Render time 2 minutes 38 seconds.
- Using a single, second generation GFX card ( 10 series )

 

So 5k under 3 minutes, and no noise.


ddd.png

 

 

 

 

Message 4 of 19
madsd
in reply to: LiamBM

2 minutes and 14 seconds render time.
3000x1800.
I guess those spheres are some kind of sketchup construct, just grabbed another random scene and pushed the render button.

qwe.png

Message 5 of 19
madsd
in reply to: LiamBM

Point camera the other direction and click render and wait some minutes.

 

ccc.png

Message 6 of 19
madsd
in reply to: LiamBM

 You can undersample and stick this into the viewport and use walk trhough agent, the circle with the dot, then use WASD + mouse. Move around in this, move items, color them.

We can set up cases that are faster than DirectX implementation in viewport even.

Alias + 1 reflection cleans faster in Arnold than the viewport is set to refine Alias on mesh when you let go of everything.

 

Message 7 of 19
zakirjoy
in reply to: leeminardi

right

Message 8 of 19
Anonymous
in reply to: madsd

Hi Madsd, 

 

Cheeky question:

Would you mind terribly posting a couple of screenshots of your render settings for that image please?

 

I'm having the same problems with Arnold as LiamB. It doesn't seem to matter if i use CPU or GPU, if i ramp up the samples to reduce noise, the render time goes through the roof.

I seem to be just chasing my tail trying to get it to work.

 

Thanks.

Message 9 of 19
madsd
in reply to: Anonymous

Which one?

The general idea is you just add a skylight and let it render on the GPU for some minutes, then utilize a post denoiser.
I am using an experimental one from one of the Arnold devs, which is better than OptiX, ( not noice.exe but an inteldenoiser implementation, I wrote a small tool so I can use it for animation, I can crank out 2k volumetric renders in 90 seconds with motion blur ) 

 

Message 10 of 19
madsd
in reply to: Anonymous

I just asked Declan if I could write an article about his stuff, and mine and he said fine!
So I will make a video at a point with links to downloads and stuff and then we need to make sure it channels out to the archviz communities and well everywhere, it's not just Archviz interiors that can render in minutes, its also otherwize expensive effects that render ultra fast.


We also did some testing and a raw brute force render, Arnold comes out in front of V-Ray and Redshift in recent tests against newer builds, so lets get this going.

Message 11 of 19
Anonymous
in reply to: LiamBM

Hello ,my Arnold render is very grainy, sorry arnold render newbie here.

I have fitted Arnold lighting and tried many different things. I am getting a lot of render errors in the render output.

 

"  This material is not supported: PillarRoots (Standard). An approximation will be used.
This material is not supported: Leaves (Standard). An approximation will be used.
This material is not supported: Canopy (Standard). An approximation will be used.
This material is not supported: 09 - Default (Standard). An approximation will be used.
[Arnold]: [photometric] can't open photometric file, no filename supplied
[Arnold]: [photometric] can't open photometric file, no filename supplied
[Arnold]: [photometric] can't open photometric file, no filename supplied
[Arnold]: [photometric] can't open photometric file, no filename supplied
[Arnold]: [photometric] can't open photometric file, no filename supplied"

I do not know if this has something to do with it or not. I have enabled legacy 3dsmax maps.

in the settings i am rendering at 1080p but the video output is 720. could anyone help why the Arnold render is so grainy.

 

Thanks is advanced. 🙂  

 

Message 12 of 19
madsd
in reply to: Anonymous

Try Archive the scene and upload it here.
I think you need to adress the fact that you are using very bright light sources, they cause a lot of indirect noise, but you can control that in multiple ways. Using a lower indirect value in the firefly setings area and then by using denoiser if you have an Nvidia card in the machine. Perhaps some finetuning of the sampler, using progressive, adaptive and threshold.

 

Message 13 of 19
Anonymous
in reply to: madsd

I hate to jump in randomly here, but I just can't reproduce what you guys are getting either. I've imported a basic model, added one Arnold Physical sky and increased the samples from 1 to 3. That's it. 

 

I'm still getting a grainy mess that takes around 10 minutes to render. Increasing samples in render settings massively increases render time, and if anything makes it grainier - I never had these issues with Mental Ray.

 

@madsd could I be an enormous pain and ask you to give it a quick look? Totally understand if you're too busy, I've just spent days on this and must be doing something wildly incorrect 😬

Message 14 of 19
Anonymous
in reply to: madsd

That's great, but that is a still and not an animation.  Took 8 hours to render a 15 second animation.

Message 15 of 19
paulo.belesa
in reply to: Anonymous

I Get the same problems,   almosto nothing in the scene and render times are over the roof. 

Im using a revit imported file, converted all to arnold surfaces  and nothing changed. 

 

Please advise. 

 

Im using CPU for render and using AMD Ryzen3700x 

 

Message 16 of 19
CiroCardoso3v
in reply to: LiamBM

Do you have a screenshot? Is an interior scene? Exterior? Which lights you have on your scene.

Lead Enviroment Artist @Axis Studios

Arnold Discord Server


Ciro Cardoso

EESignature

Message 17 of 19
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

did this ever get resolved? i'm having the same issues. can you please respond to this email?

shawn@dehartdesignstudio.com  

Message 18 of 19
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

me too.

i can't seem to clean this up. i have been reading for days.

please respond to this email.

shawn_0-1615239618373.png

 

Message 19 of 19
CiroCardoso3v
in reply to: Anonymous

Create a thread on Arnold Answers. You will have more help there. And when you do that, share your render settings, how many samples for each light and if possible a log. This is a very old thread so it is better if you start a new one. 

Lead Enviroment Artist @Axis Studios

Arnold Discord Server


Ciro Cardoso

EESignature

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report