Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
We need high quality and advanced tools for sculpting. Tool that are available now are not enough - they are very basic. We have be able to create and sculpt high density models as Blender can. Along with the texture painting. Right now the current canvas paint work to slow.
There was an entry on the old Roadmap (when this was available) about unifying brush tools and brush systems and there was a screenshot of a toolbox similar to one of Mudbox. For a moment I thought its gonna happen but...
My opinion is that this single topic puts 3DS Max far behind Blender. I prefer to work in Max because of Blender oddities and top-notch rendering engines (ie, missing UVW Map modifier).
Still, sculpting features could greatly empower the modelling department for upholstery in Archviz and hundreds of other use cases.
Mudbox is dead, max is far behind Blender, even Mudbox still alive, requires two software to complete, you need to pay for a abandoned Software, which is very painful. Blender can done is all fast and easy. I advise you not to have any expectations to autodesk.
