Community
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
"Jayman" <How
href="mailto:jlickver@lineartransfer.com">jlickver@lineartransfer.com>
schrieb im Newsbeitrag
href="news:f12043d.9@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f12043d.9@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
about a novel idea... Autodesk waits one more month before release - using
that extra month to further beta testing. The wait might just be worth the
reduction in headaches. I know i wouldn't mind.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"davej" <Theoreticly,
href="mailto:davej@autoconcorp.com">davej@autoconcorp.com> wrote in
message
href="news:f12043d.2@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f12043d.2@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
you should need as few service packs as possible. Ideally, none. I'd rather
have a company put out one stable SP then 5 of them that address one or two
issues each until at SP6 it's FINALLY stable.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"jorgen" <bjornes@email.com>We
wrote in message
href="news:f12043d.7@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f12043d.7@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
should also give them time to test the SP's.
Solidworks apperantly do not
take time to test all the small sp's good enough.
I think quality control
is easier/better with big SP's.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"davej" <I
href="mailto:davej@autoconcorp.com">davej@autoconcorp.com> wrote in
message
href="news:f12043d.5@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f12043d.5@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
guess it's all a matter of preference. I liked the fact that 5.3 only had only
2 SP's, and I could see a good change in each. I would think that if I got
more SP's that didn't address everything, I would be upset that they didn't
fix this or that. <shrug>
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.