Hey Himanshu;
In seconding Brian's motion, I will put forth the suggestion that it will likely occur to us (probably sooner rather than later) to use FG profiles to identify Future conditions as well, and so we would find the ability to use either simple or complex linetypes a necessity.
--
Don Reichle
Hacker Engineering, Inc.
"King of Work-Arounds"
LDT & CD 2004
C3D 2004 SP1
On HP Pavilion a367c
2.80 Ghz/512MB RAM
XP PRO - SP2
"Brian Hailey" wrote in message news:4194d502$1_3@newsprd01...
> Hi Himanshu,
>
> You are probably right, the FG profiles USUALLY don't have the small
> segments but, why limit their versatility? Is it that much more difficult
> to program the FG plinegen than the EG plinegen? Why not just do them all
> and let the user decide how they would look best?
>
> --
> Brian Hailey
> LDT2005
> C3D2005
> XP Pro - SP 2
> P4 2.8GHz
> 1.00 GB of RAM
>
>> I've looked at all the responses to this so far, and it seems like most of
>> you are asking for the application PLINEGEN to EG and Superimposed
>> profiles,
>> not FG profiles. My thinking is that FG profiles usually don't have those
>> small segments that make it look continuous in places when the PLINEGEN
>> setting is not applied. Is that correct? Ofcourse, you can still apply a
>> line type to the FG profile, just that PLINEGEN would not apply...
>>
>> --
>> Himanshu Gohel. Civil3D Team, Autodesk, Inc.
>>
>>
>
>