For polymeric materials containing a micro-scale filler with an aspect ratio greater than 1 (i.e. a typical short or long discontinuous fiber), the AMI solver calculates the mechanical properties and thermal expansion coefficients (E11, E22, G12, G23, ν12, ν23, α1, and α2) of an idealized, perfectly-aligned discontinuous fiber composite material using a (selectable) micromechanics model (such as Mori-Tanaka) and a (selectable) model for thermal expansion (such as Rosen-Hashin). Currently, the properties of the matrix* and the fiber(s) present in the composite material are listed in the analysis log; however, the solver-calculated properties of the idealized fiber-reinforced composite material are currently NOT reported in analysis log files. These solver-calculated idealized composite material values should also be reported within the analysis log in addition to those of the matrix and the fiber(s). Like the analysis log-reported defined (or calculated via decomposition) intermediate result of matrix properties and the defined properties of the fiber(s) (also displayed in the analysis log file), knowing what properties are used for the idealized discontinuous fiber-reinforced composite material generated from these constituents is important in the “warpage” analysis process as it is the basis for calculating and understanding the non-idealized properties reviewable by a user. If the idealized composite is in error, further calculated results are meaningless. The ability to easily review the properties of the idealized composite in the analysis log would serve as an up-front “sanity check” before significant computational effort may be expended on a deflection analysis trial(s). Additionally, having all (fiber(s), matrix, and composite) of these intermediate results accurately recorded and easily retrievable in a simulation trial’s analysis log file is important when iterative simulation trials using material variants are conducted. *While anisotropic matrix properties can be entered, analysis log files seem to only report isotropic matrix properties regardless of source data or the micromechanics model selected. For example, the first image below is a portion of an analysis log file (release 2017.3) for a short glass fiber-filled polypropylene material where “Use 7 matrix properties” was selected. Matrix properties were anisotropic (first image below); however, the analysis log file for this analysis trial seems to have recorded matrix properties as isotropic (E, ν, α1) using 1st principal direction properties (second image below). Note: Mori-Tanaka and Rosen-Hashin were selected for composite property modeling as is also shown below (third image). Autodesk has recognized this as a bug for a future release correction. Autodesk comment below: “The analysis output is incomplete when anisotropic matrix properties are used. We'll log this bug and fix it soon.”
Show More