Dear team
I suppose the operation I am after is difficult to explain: I try to reduce the "wall thickness" of an object of mine in height by 1.5 mm while decreasing the width and thickness by 1 mm. I do not try to just change the length of my object from like 50 mm to 48.5 mm, I try to reduce every surface by that amount. So if I were to hollow my object with a wall thinkness of 1.5 mm in height and 1 mm in width and thickness, then fill that object again and attain that infill as a seperate object, then that is the object I am after. Operations that come to mind don't seem to work:
"Offset" (which additionally does not seem to work how I think it should with negative values, at -3 mm there should be holes in my object which is not the case) only works on all dimensions at the same time.
Filling after a "Hollow" command while trying to attain that infill as a separate object (if even possible) at the very least also fails because the Hollow command does not allow me to pick a dimension and changes all dimensions in the same way.
So is there a way to achieve this? If not, what is the best way to reduce by 1 mm flat in all dimensions?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by hfcandrew. Go to Solution.
Yes all t his is possible, might need to do a series of offsets or soft transforms, or delete your targets surface and just redo it.
Hard to give specifics without the .mix...
Thank you for your answer, and apologies for my late reply, I am rather busy, unfortunately.
It is a model of an ear. It's an .stl file on my laptop, I suppose that's what you are after? Thank you for looking into it.
Ya all that is workable.
If you provide some schematics of screenshots on the dimensions you want I'll do it and send a video. This is too complex to type.
What do you mean by schematics or screenshots? 3D rendered images maybe? I suppose constructing those is an equivalent problem of constructing the ear myself?
I can offer a better explanation than in my initial inquiry, however: The outer surface is to be reduced by 1.5 mm in height and 1 mm in the other 2 dimensions, width and depth.
Thank you in particular for offering to film a video for me, I think that would help me a lot, and next time I can just do it myself. I hope my explanation is unambiguous, even if not maybe you could just reconstruct what you think is correct based on the explanation? Even if you get something wrong I should be able to fix that with the help of the video. I am uncertain of how to attain the schematics you asked for.
Thank you very much! Mainly I did not know the Separate Shells command, that helped a lot! 🙂
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.