When a record is cloned, the change log on the new item does not display what record it was cloned from. it just states the record was created. this log should list what item it was cloned from.   Show More

License management in F360M is not good enough In the security from F360M you can see which user is “ACTIVE”, “INACTIVE” or “DELETED”. If a User is having a License or not, is set in the Autodesk Account. The User can only work, if in the Account is a License assigned to the User. The synchronization between the Account and F360M should be done, when the User login in F360M. Then the status from the License is updated.   However, this is a major problem. This causes differences between the Account and F360M. Users, that are no longer in the company, can’t login in F360M. The User does not have a License, because it is removed in the Account. Or the User left the company and does not go to F360M and login anymore.   In case of that, in F360M are Users listed with a Licence. In the Account the License no longer assigned to this User. If you want to see as F360M Manager how many Licenses are pending, there is a gap between the Account and F360M.   It needs a possibility to synchronise the Account License with F360M. The F360M Admin does not have always access to the Account. However, he is all coordinating with F360M. Show More

If you have required Fields, it validates that the value for a given field is entered. If not, it is marked and displayed with a red frame.   This is a great help for the User. You can see, what is missing.     Somthing similar would be great to have for validation. At the moment, you can validate fields. If needed, you can push a message to the User. Some Workspaces can have several sections, and in any section multiple fields. This can make it difficult to the User to finde the correct field, that must be updated or needs to be corrected. If in the script can be, like the push message, fields be marked. That would be a great improvement. User can find the field more simple with visual help and get the message.  Show More

The Users-All picklist is not good enough.   Please provide a user selection field to be based on a group(s).   Either define this on the field level (idea pic below, like section permissions) or allow to define using picklists based on group(s).   Consider a picklist called “reviewer”: I do not want the user to be able to select people that are not suitable (or who might not have permission) I want a small list of people to choose from. I do NOT want a Supplier user to see other Suppliers’ users.   The typical workaround, using an Employee reference workspace (and picklists based on “where IS_REVIEWER is TRUE”, etc) is often a poor solution: ☹️Good flexibility, but high config effort, and needs synchronising to group members for permissions. ☹️Resulting field is “Picklist from a workspace”.  This cannot be used in a Workflow transition PRE-CONDITION FILTER ☹️This means that I MUST use either a condition script, poor performance and cannot benefit from the PRE-CONDITION FILTER ☹️Result is that MY OUTSTANDING WORK has poor performance.   The App Store apps all beautifully demonstrate this fundamental problem(!) As you start to scale the deployment, the “Users All By Name” becomes unusable, and the default Apps are seriously undermined.   Conclusion: 😀For large installations, we need more ability to configure members of user selection fields. 😀This would allow to move to PRE-CONDITION FILTERS… 😀avoid Condition scripts 😀avoid the terrible performance seen on My Outstanding Work for large deployments, that cannot currently are forced to use Condition scripts   We need even more than this in future…. 😋A picklist that can select groups in the system. 🤗An approval team item could select this group. 😍Then I want a task to be able to select an approval team, and have its group control the list of users selectable. …   But the above would be a good start, and a massive improvement in the product for little development effort.   Impressive mockup Show More

for a picklist field "Display as a link" is pointless in Modern UI. the selection is there but doesn't do anything. it was explained to me from a prior Support ticket that the current functionality will display all workspace picklist as a link. so why do we have the option if it doesn't work? I would rather not "Display as a Link" or have the option to enable or disable it like we had in Classic.   Show More

E-Mail notifications for delegations are sent out in the language of the delegator, which may lead to confusion, even if it probably is clear as it was announced via a different communication channel. The notification should instead be in the language of the receiver. Show More

Hi, this idea (https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-manage-ideas/sort-fields-in-classification-manager-for-desired-order-in-item/idi-p/6637462) has been archived with the comment "let's review in the context of the modern interface", but the situation remained the same. So, I'd like to bring this idea back to the table.   The reasons why it is important to sort the properties are: 1. relevance: as mentioned in other posts, relevant properties should be on top 2. consistency: if the property "material" is the second property in one class, it should be also other classes, as the user gets used to having a certain property at a certain place, and inputs the data "blindly" 3. build the description of items out of the classification properties, so the order matters Show More

In a Workspace, whenever you have more than one section, it would be helpful to have a number for orientation. As a User, you can see the desciption and a number. You know, if you talk with another person, we have to change "XXZ" in Section Nr. 5 - Autodesk. Especially when there are several sections, which may not always be immediately distinguishable from the description. It is not always that simple as in this example.   As it looks like for the Administrator. No section number are added behind the description. This can make it more difficult to find the correct section, in which adjustments must be made.   It would help to imporve the user-friendliness. Show More

Do you know how many characters left? In the Field «Single Line Text» and «Paragraph» can be the maximum length of value be set. The characters must be limited, especially when it goes to other systems. In Paragraph, when you add your information you don't know how many characters you have used. As example, if it is limited to 1000 characters, it would be very helpful to have a counter that display the length of your actual text. If you have used up the maximum of characters while writing, it would be helpful to know this in advance.   How it could be solved is shown in the pictrue.  Show More