Community
Fusion Design, Validate & Document
Stuck on a workflow? Have a tricky question about a Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) feature? Share your project, tips and tricks, ask questions, and get advice from the community.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Insert Derive does not add the component to the Browser

21 REPLIES 21
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 22
ykompis
3608 Views, 21 Replies

Insert Derive does not add the component to the Browser

When I insert a component using "Insert Derive", Fusion usually adds the component to the Window and the Browser. When inserting more than one component from different files, only the first gets added to the Window and Browser. All consecutive derives are "ghost" components. You can select them via the History, but only the blue shadow of the component appears. "Find in Browser" and "Find in Window" in the History menu do not work. If I close and re-open the file before inserting a second component it works as expected.

 

I can recreate the bug in new designs when inserting screws from my library, but I could not recreate it using arbitrary shapes. 

My screw library uses threads (not modeled) and a few user parameter describing the geometry.

 

The screenshot show a "ghost" screw in the Window. The joints are not necessary to recreate the bug.

 

Bildschirmfoto 2018-11-21 um 16.52.53.png

 

The file is available here: https://a360.co/2FzUtOQ

The second screw does not show up in the online preview, but after downloading the Fusion Archive and importing it it is visible again in the history, but nowhere else.

21 REPLIES 21
Message 2 of 22
tyler_henderson
in reply to: ykompis

This certainly doesn't look right.  I downloaded your design and I see the same thing.  Can you tell me if the designs you are inserting are in the same Hub and Project as the target design?

Tyler Henderson
Principal User Experience Designer

Message 3 of 22
tyler_henderson
in reply to: ykompis

Also, if you run "Compute All" (on the Modify panel), does that fix the issue?

 

Tyler Henderson
Principal User Experience Designer

Message 4 of 22
TrippyLighting
in reply to: ykompis

Can you explain why you would derive those individual components and not use insert ?


EESignature

Message 5 of 22
ykompis
in reply to: tyler_henderson

Yes they are. The location of the file does not seem to affect or cause the problem.

Message 6 of 22
ykompis
in reply to: tyler_henderson

Compute All does strange things... It changes which derived component is displayed in the Window and Browser. But all other derives become "ghosts". Recomputing everything multiple times just switches between the derived components.

Message 7 of 22
ykompis
in reply to: TrippyLighting

No particular reason other than playing around with the new feature. But I agree these components don't need to be edited and Insert would do the job just fine.... But this should be possible with both methods.

Message 8 of 22
TrippyLighting
in reply to: ykompis


@ykompis wrote:

But this should be possible with both methods.


Agreed! Thanks for reporting this behavior!


EESignature

Message 9 of 22
tyler_henderson
in reply to: ykompis

Ok, this is certainly not expected.  I'll get a bugged logged for this.  Another thing to try is push Derive (on the Create panel) and see if you get the same weird behavior.

 

Tyler Henderson
Principal User Experience Designer

Message 10 of 22
tyler_henderson
in reply to: ykompis

I think we discovered the issue.  Was one of these designs created by copying (Save As) another design?  I tried this theory and was able to reproduce exactly what you're seeing.

 

Tyler Henderson
Principal User Experience Designer

Message 11 of 22
mavigogun
in reply to: tyler_henderson


@tyler_henderson wrote:

I think we discovered the issue.  Was one of these designs created by copying (Save As) another design?  I tried this theory and was able to reproduce exactly what you're seeing.

 



Should I take from that "save as" imposes some... condition?    Could you elaborate on why this occurred to y'all as a possibility in the first place?

Message 12 of 22
ykompis
in reply to: tyler_henderson

Yes! I used Save As and User Parameters to create all different kinds of lengths and sizes.

So is that behaviour still just a bug or is my workflow not recommended? Maybe Fusion needs a Duplicate Design option that properly takes care of „separating“ files?

Message 13 of 22
kgrunawalt
in reply to: mavigogun

Save copy as does not impose a condition. The problem is an identity issue between the original and saved-as model that should not happen. This is a bug that causes the second derive to fail.

 

For the moment, there is no workaround other than avoiding deriving a save-copy-as source and target into the same design. We are working on a fix. We're sorry for the trouble.

 

Message 14 of 22

Having the same problems as the OP.

I have the same workflow, saved a 'template' file with minor differences on the copies.

Managed to get the insert to work using the create in the derived part

Getting a lots of crashes when updating the derived part though

Hopefully you can fix soon.

Message 15 of 22
Anonymous
in reply to: GeoffPacker7777

I actually have the same problem.

Message 16 of 22
Anonymous
in reply to: kgrunawalt

I have the same problem.

Message 17 of 22
Anonymous
in reply to: kgrunawalt

I've created a copy of one component design and made hours of changes. Later on, I inserted a derive of another component, that would eventually not sync changes and, if removed, become a ghost link. Now I can't remove this ghost component and can't insert updated derives...

 

There is a way to overcome this bug?

Message 18 of 22
tyler_henderson
in reply to: Anonymous

Can you delete the Derive feature from the timeline?  Or maybe promote the version just prior to inserting the Derive?

Tyler Henderson
Principal User Experience Designer

Message 19 of 22
MACABItech
in reply to: kgrunawalt

Why is this marked as the solution? Is the solution just that its a bug?

I'm having this issue now. And its bad timing, as I was just on the phone today with Autodesk about purchasing the license to lock in the price for the future. This a deterrent. Does anyone know if a solution has been figured out at this point?

Message 20 of 22

Apologies, this shouldn't be marked as solved, but anyone can accept a post as a solution.  This issue is being actively worked on.  The internal issue number we are tracking is FUS-44617.

Tyler Henderson
Principal User Experience Designer

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report