i would like if autodesk add option of designing a footing under more than 2 footing, currently it has the option to design maximum of 2 columns in footing.   Daha Fazla Göster

There's an addin that draws geometric line beneath a curtain wall, what if multiple lines were drawn say for 80 stories? I think it would very useful if there was an option that lets you choose all lines and convert them to bars at once. Daha Fazla Göster

I think that the use of Robot in Latin America has increased in recent years. For this reason, it is important to give a higher range of steel sections of the parametric type, such as basic sections in L and double L, that would give the alternative to create another type of cold rolled profiles.   Daha Fazla Göster

There is no way at the moment to check the changes between 2 models of the same structure. Along the life of a project, small design changes cause the checker of a model to review all of it in case that there has been an accidental modification of other part of the structure than the intended. It is a very laborious and error prone process to check 2 versions of the same structure, a plugin to compare 2 close models would save many hours of time. Daha Fazla Göster

It is very hard to display, assigned loads on elements, especially on shells. It can be very useful,if u can see a assigned load table or simple list when u go object properties or load properties for each element. Now it is very hard to see for a signle element's assigned loads. Current load table brings all loads and cases for whole structure Daha Fazla Göster

Hello   It is necessary to add possibility to enter more accurate velocity factor (at least up to second number after coma) or add numerical entering (height + velocity factor) in Wind simulation option. Wind peak pressure have quite small increment per height and it is very hard to enter it accurately. And after multiplication it on load area this inaccuracy lead to large over- or under-load.   Beast regards! Daha Fazla Göster

This software is awesome. I want to highlight some features which are missing in this software. As I am form India, I frequently require to analyse the structure for equivalent lateral force method as per IS 1893:2002 whichis not present i this software. Other softwares such as Etabs and Staad have already this feature. 1. Also many softwares including robot have not readymade staircase modeling feature which is very important. I know that there are many ways to simulate the stairecase conditions but those are complex. Many stairecases such as slabless stepped staircase, circular staircase, etc are very difficult to model and hence I thing that it will be a unique feature of robot if developers provide this feature in it. I am asking this because staircase modeling in revit is very easy because it has that feature then why robot doesnt have. 2. The detailing of members is very much good but in my opinion there is a large scope to improve the software in this section. Because in the India the drawings are not represented in the way that robot represents. The drawings which are sent to the contractor are in different layout. In detailing, documentation and design sections S-Cube RCDC is much ahead in India and many structural firms are using this software. This is the major reason for diversion of engineers in India to staad and etabs because the analysis files can be imported in RCDC. RCDC gives much quality represenation of drawings and documentation consolidately and hence this is my request to the Autodesk that please bring some simplicity in these sections or bring separate module for design, detailing and documentaion. Thank you and sorry for bad english. Daha Fazla Göster

In RC buildings design ,   1- it will be great if there are options for RC columns ( column with head or with out head) as in flat slabs . 2- Options for selection slab types ,( waffle slabs , ribbed slabs , etc ) Daha Fazla Göster

It would be great if we could apply partial elastic surface support to a panel by using a contour.  There are many cases when dealing with concrete slab on grade design to have the ability to either vary the subgrade modulus over an area.  When doing P.T. slab on grade design, one needs to only have a portion of the slab supported, thus the current surface support will not work.  As far as implementation, being able to draw this in as a surface load on a contour would be great.  For a variable modulus, one could use the 3 point contour. Daha Fazla Göster

General: 1) Improvement in general acceleration when creating/viewing a model/ when changing loads etc. 2) Solver improvement - multhithreaded solvers (all)   Geometry: 1) It would be great if we could identify in a 2D model type of linear support (added to panel edge).for e.g. whether it is a concrete wall or masonry wall. Right now it's not possible. 2) Would be excellent if you could put all the add-ins from forum into ARSA 3) More advanced "Phase mode" 4) Option like: Cut panel by/to other panel   Analysis: 1) Differential shortening of columns in tall buildings (at least steel one's) calculation   Design: 1) Composite structures design 2) Steelwork design - more types of connections for steel elements   Daha Fazla Göster