SLS combination

SLS combination

Anonymous
Not applicable
7,600 Views
22 Replies
Message 1 of 23

SLS combination

Anonymous
Not applicable

When I'm trying to calculate required reinforcement for slabs, as well as beams. I get the folowing error: "Required types are not ascribed to SLS combinations. Calculations may be incorrect."

 

Whats wrong? 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
7,601 Views
22 Replies
Replies (22)
Message 21 of 23

Andyf88
Contributor
Contributor
Sorry, any idea why SLS when acting alone, compared to ULS, gives:

1. higher reinforcement

2. and why it gives reinforcement at the bottom of the slab in the area under columns, (usually expected top reinforcement only in this area)?

Thank you.
0 Likes
Message 22 of 23

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

As I wrote the algorithm is not optimized for running SLS cases only but in general:

 

1. Keeping cracks under the defined limit may require more reinforcement than is required to fulfill strength requirements. In addition you may see the increase of reinforcement if you mark reduction of the deflection by increase of (SLS) reinforcement.

2. In may be the attempt to increase 'cracked' slab thickness stiffness for the correction of the deflection or compression reinforcement in case you have very high bending moment.

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
Message 23 of 23

Andyf88
Contributor
Contributor
Artur,

Thank you very much, very helpful.

Regards,
0 Likes