Slow Calculations/Results Modal Analysis

Slow Calculations/Results Modal Analysis

Anonymous
Not applicable
1,449 Views
10 Replies
Message 1 of 11

Slow Calculations/Results Modal Analysis

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

I'm modeling a long building (36x140 m2) and when I run the modal analysis it takes quite a long time calculating. It also says that mass participation is not satisfactory. When I try to see the modes of vibration it gets even slower and I dont get to see them.

 

Structure has 8 slabs, bottom 2 slabs are simply supported to portray the underground walls. Beam is just on contour of slabs, and slab is simply supported on internal columns. I used emmiters above columns for a better meshing option (High number of nodes). 

 

RT file is quite large aprox. 80MB.

 

Not sure if its normal to take so long due to being a large building, or I am doing something wrong.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

File to large for attachment. 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
1,450 Views
10 Replies
Replies (10)
Message 2 of 11

Rafacascudo
Mentor
Mentor
  1. Save the file with a different name and without results(save as) , and then attach it here. Zip/rar it if it is still too big.

Rafael Medeiros
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 3 of 11

Anonymous
Not applicable

Sorry, forgot to delete the part where it says file to big for attach. Its zipped in attachment already and I also did it the way you said.

 

Thanks.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 11

eear_gabriel
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Rafael, do you recommend any tutorial for learning Robot?

0 Likes
Message 5 of 11

Simau
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Hi @Anonymous

 

you have not converted cases en masse. Case 8 that you tried to convert does not contain any load.
You also neglected the density and you did not convert case 10.
I run your model by converting only the 10 selfwiegth case. And it works fine.
As you have 2 fixed floors on 8 levels, you will never be able to vibrate the 2 lower levels, so 25% of non-convertible masses.
For the message "missing eigenvalues", just clik "No"

Sismic.jpgEigenvalue.jpg

Vibration.jpg

 

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 6 of 11

Rafacascudo
Mentor
Mentor

Well , some 17 years ago I learned Robot by myself consulting the manuals ,help files  ,and in last case, emailing the support Guys( the same that are here tody)with my doubts .

Now there are lots of sources . Search the fixed threads especially

 

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vault-lots-of-information-for-n...

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/latest-updates-new-knowledge-network-...

The official RSA webinars on Build your Robot Structural Analysis IQ - YouTube 

A good book on https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&text=Ken+Marsh&search-alias=books-uk&fiel...

And of course  ,now we have this forum which ,in my opinion , is the best soucefor easy and fast RSA knowledge .

By far the best among all Structural software packages in the market

 

 

 

Rafael Medeiros
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 7 of 11

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thanks for the help.

 

Ive considered just case 10 for mass conversion and I have not considered the "disregard density" option. When I run it on my laptop it takes about 25 mins for the full process (verification and analysis). I started the calculations at 20h49 and got through the whole process at 21h13. Does that seem reasonable? 

 

The modes I am retrieving are different from the ones you posted. Not sure what it is I'm missing here. 

0 Likes
Message 8 of 11

Simau
Mentor
Mentor

@Anonymous

 

looking at your results, we get the same mobilzed masses.

Frequencies are slightly different.

Did you get warning about "missing eigenvalues" and what did you reply: "yes" or "no"?

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 9 of 11

Anonymous
Not applicable

"No" as you said. 

 

How long does it take you to run the calculations?

0 Likes
Message 10 of 11

Simau
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Yes

calculation time is reasonable, 24 min also here.

You may reduce time by increasing mesh size, you have 161280 finite elements and 902088 degres of freedom

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 11 of 11

eear_gabriel
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Cheers mate..I`ll definitely have a look at these sources..thanks again

0 Likes