Slab Deflection Results Reading

faisal.aaouatif
Collaborator
Collaborator

Slab Deflection Results Reading

faisal.aaouatif
Collaborator
Collaborator

Good Morning/Evening

Please indicate if the deflection results should be read directly from the RSA display ( see attachement ) or one should substract values under slab supports (Beams in this case) :

1. Defl at center = 1.90 mm

2. Defl at center = 1.90 - 0.81 = 1.09 mm

Thank you

 

0 Likes
Reply
Accepted solutions (1)
868 Views
3 Replies
Replies (3)

EduardoMeruvia
Collaborator
Collaborator

Hi faisal.aaouatif

 

The 1.9mm settlement on your slab at the middle is the total "displacement" of your panel at that point i.e. That is the global displacement of you panel as a whole. 

 

If you checking your panel/slab for SLS 'Deflections' then the total DIFFERENTIAL deflection is what you should be looking at i.e. the 1.9 - 0.81 = 1.09mm as this is the "TRUE" bowing of your slab. Similar logic can be applied to beam members. 

 

Hope this helps. 

 

 

 

0 Likes

faisal.aaouatif
Collaborator
Collaborator

Thanks for your reply Eduardo ,

 

This is what i am expecting : deflections is a displacement difference between two points , one point on a support (or not) , the other on the element investigated.

 

I dont know if it is convenient to talk about deflection in slabs unless we precise in regard to what ( for beams , its a little bit clear because support are identified and are nodal )  , especially for slabs with different supports stiffness's.

 

My design process is to verify slab "Primary supports" ( horizontal ) deflections in regard to their supports ( vertical ) , especially if they are embedded in the slab ,  and then verify the deflection of the slab itself to these Primary supports, by subtracting their "displacement" from slab's one. ( values displayed in the "Deflections map )

 

What do you think about that ?

 

A little Remark to Rafal/Artur Man Happy, wouldn't be convenient to uniformise terms in this userform and similar ? ( see attachement please )

 

Thanks a lot.

 

0 Likes

EduardoMeruvia
Collaborator
Collaborator
Accepted solution

I think your approach as outline below is suitable for the checks you are doing. 

 

The Differential displacements in a slab is its final deflected shape and should be used as such, as more often than not this "differential" deflected shape produces a greater curvature in the slab/beam. See figure below; 

 Slab DeflectionsSlab Deflections

 Of course in two-way slabs such in your case, you would need to check these deflections in both ways respectively. Specially if the slab is rectangular with a large Width to Length Ratio.

 

 

0 Likes