RC cantilever beam Very Important

RC cantilever beam Very Important

Anonymous
Not applicable
2,012 Views
9 Replies
Message 1 of 10

RC cantilever beam Very Important

Anonymous
Not applicable

Which of These Cases will move the load correctlly to the other beam considering that theres no column under the connection between them? and how can i verify ?

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
2,013 Views
9 Replies
Replies (9)
Message 2 of 10

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

The design of RC beams is based on the results obtained for the model itself which means that regardless of the decision on locations of supports you make during the export of a beam from a model to the RC Beam design module you will have the same bending and shear forces. The decision on the supports is for reinforcement distribution and you need to make your mind on this (you may e.g. decide that each of the beam supports the other or both are cantilevers - e.g. imagine a situation when you have two identical beams with the same load applied forming an L shape having one common node and fixed supports in the outer nodes). For the situation as on your picture I would probably select schemes 1 and 4. 



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 3 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

ok Good, im with you that the bending will be the same .
But as a reinforcement if i choose 1 and 4 thats mean the program will deal with them as cantilever and the top steel will be increased at each of them . while on real life it will be one supported to the other which will reflect on the steel as the one will be carried the main steel will be at the bottom but for the other on the main will be at the top .
am i right?!!

0 Likes
Message 4 of 10

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

I'm sorry. I meant 1 and 2. 

 

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 5 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

or 3 and 4 right , I just want to confirm the concept in my mind

0 Likes
Message 6 of 10

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

or 1 and 4 for the L beams ararngement I described (which is why I typed 4 instead of 2) Smiley Happy

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 7 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

I was trying to get the same results for L beam in rc beam but its showed i need to have some kind of support on the lose end. How to fix this problem ??

0 Likes
Message 8 of 10

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @Anonymous 

 

Could you attach a screen capture showing the actual situation?



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 9 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

The mistake was mine i didnt made right supports. Can you tell me if I used correct supports0.png1.png2.png3.png

0 Likes
Message 10 of 10

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @Anonymous 

 

If you consider both beams acting like cantilevers then it is correct however personally I'd not use offsets.

 

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.

 

 



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes