Hi Krzysztof;
In my first post, I described the "general" mesh incompatibility problem for objects generated as extruded using the solid modeler built-in tools (Geometry menu> Objects> Extrude & Edit menu> Modify Substructure> Modify Object)
and others simple objects (i.e. flat panels).
I did not continue this approach because of the silo will only be a small part of my complex 3D model.
I think any modification of the adjoining structure will result in errors in the mesh connections in the future.
The generated funnel and cylinder objects are "locked" in Robot and cannot be modified. This is a "one-time" operation and the mesh parameters do not work for such generated objects.
It's like creating a mesh manually by deliberately dividing an object - this is not today's method.
This should be done by an automatic generator for all user-set parameters.
In my second post, I would like to highlight the issue and ask why the standard approach to creating panels with edges from simple geometric objects (arcs in this case) leads to incoherent meshes along common edges.
Why cannot Robot handle problem with mesh generation between ordinary cone and cylinder surfaces?
This is such a simple geometric case that I could write a macro to generate FE nodes from rectangles and trapezoids or import from other program - but this is not an expected solution - rather Robot should be able to do it for any 3D model.
Therefore, I also gave an example from another FEM system that was done in seconds and correctly!
PS.
Thanks for the video !
I'll try to divide the edges like you did, but I'm worried if it works in my 3d model and about the size of the task (extracting the results for the entire model).
