Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Error 2809 - Modal Analysis

9 REPLIES 9
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 10
Gabriela.Bercot
590 Views, 9 Replies

Error 2809 - Modal Analysis

Gabriela.Bercot
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Hi,

 

I am working a model and I am getting error 2809, it seems to be something linked to the Modal analysis as when I delete this, there's no issue. However, I need this one the analysis. I checked everything I thought.

Could someone help me with this? Not sure how to fix it.

0 Likes

Error 2809 - Modal Analysis

Hi,

 

I am working a model and I am getting error 2809, it seems to be something linked to the Modal analysis as when I delete this, there's no issue. However, I need this one the analysis. I checked everything I thought.

Could someone help me with this? Not sure how to fix it.

9 REPLIES 9
Message 2 of 10

Krzysztof_Wasik
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi Model is not supported. It causes static instability. For such model program cannot calculate normal modes.



Krzysztof Wasik
0 Likes

Hi Model is not supported. It causes static instability. For such model program cannot calculate normal modes.



Krzysztof Wasik
Message 3 of 10

Gabriela.Bercot
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
How could I have seismic loads in this condition? I quite don't understand, I produced a model before and had Modal Analysis/Seismic before and I haven't got the same error - something I may be missing perhaps
0 Likes

How could I have seismic loads in this condition? I quite don't understand, I produced a model before and had Modal Analysis/Seismic before and I haven't got the same error - something I may be missing perhaps
Message 4 of 10

Krzysztof_Wasik
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

HI @Gabriela.Bercot 

In my opinion supports are missing

I have deleted all load cases except load self-weight and run calculation. Refer to displacement presentation.

Krzysztof_Wasik_0-1707828415282.png

You have to define supports in the model. Otherwise all results will be incorrect.



Krzysztof Wasik
0 Likes

HI @Gabriela.Bercot 

In my opinion supports are missing

I have deleted all load cases except load self-weight and run calculation. Refer to displacement presentation.

Krzysztof_Wasik_0-1707828415282.png

You have to define supports in the model. Otherwise all results will be incorrect.



Krzysztof Wasik
Message 5 of 10

Gabriela.Bercot
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Understood, I'll try that. I supposed to have a raft foundation, how do I define this on the model as the support?
0 Likes

Understood, I'll try that. I supposed to have a raft foundation, how do I define this on the model as the support?
Message 6 of 10

Krzysztof_Wasik
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @Gabriela.Bercot 

I would recommend defining elastic support within slab 400 thk thickness label.

Refer to

 How to apply soil elasticity on a raft foundation created as a panel in Robot Structural Analysis

 

Definition procedure is presented also in the following video

 

 



Krzysztof Wasik
0 Likes

Hi @Gabriela.Bercot 

I would recommend defining elastic support within slab 400 thk thickness label.

Refer to

 How to apply soil elasticity on a raft foundation created as a panel in Robot Structural Analysis

 

Definition procedure is presented also in the following video

 

 



Krzysztof Wasik
Message 7 of 10

Gabriela.Bercot
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Hi @Krzysztof_Wasik, thanks for your response, I added the spring values to the raft slab. However, I am still getting weird values on my bending diagrams. Any idea why that could be happening?

GabrielaBercot_0-1707839293548.png

 

0 Likes

Hi @Krzysztof_Wasik, thanks for your response, I added the spring values to the raft slab. However, I am still getting weird values on my bending diagrams. Any idea why that could be happening?

GabrielaBercot_0-1707839293548.png

 

Message 8 of 10

Krzysztof_Wasik
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

HI @Gabriela.Bercot 

Which is member number with weird results. Could you explain what you expect. 



Krzysztof Wasik
0 Likes

HI @Gabriela.Bercot 

Which is member number with weird results. Could you explain what you expect. 



Krzysztof Wasik
Message 9 of 10

Gabriela.Bercot
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Hi @Krzysztof_Wasik.

 

I was expecting diagrams looking like the picture below as I didn't set up releases for my beams - the picture it is just an indicative from another model.

 

GabrielaBercot_0-1707899616108.png

 

However I am getting bending (My) diagrams like this, it seems something is off with the model

GabrielaBercot_1-1707899913147.png

 

0 Likes

Hi @Krzysztof_Wasik.

 

I was expecting diagrams looking like the picture below as I didn't set up releases for my beams - the picture it is just an indicative from another model.

 

GabrielaBercot_0-1707899616108.png

 

However I am getting bending (My) diagrams like this, it seems something is off with the model

GabrielaBercot_1-1707899913147.png

 

Message 10 of 10

Krzysztof_Wasik
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

Hi @Gabriela.Bercot 

Members 44 to 48 are connected to "wall" members. Moment shows interaction with wall finite elements.

Krzysztof_Wasik_0-1707904767539.png

 



Krzysztof Wasik
0 Likes

Hi @Gabriela.Bercot 

Members 44 to 48 are connected to "wall" members. Moment shows interaction with wall finite elements.

Krzysztof_Wasik_0-1707904767539.png

 



Krzysztof Wasik

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report