- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Morning all,
I have a query with regards defining groups in the object inspector to allow me to show/hide which parts of the structure I can see. Thus far, I have been selecting the items I want in a group, using the 'Create a group out of the selection' tool and assigning a name to each set of objects in the group for ease of reference and then using group folders to make the filtering process as easy as possible (see below screenshot).
This all works but I do find it a bit cumbersome for the following reasons:
- I have to assign separate names to each object type in a group (e.g. R02.01 - BEAMS, R02.01 - NODES, R02.01 - COLUMNS, RO2.01 - SHEETING) as opposed to assigning a single name to cover all object types in a group.
- Expanding or reducing the scope of groups is often best done by means of deleting and recreating the group.
- The same objects will often appear across multiple groups depending on what I am doing. For example, using the groups in the screenshot above, I have separate groups for each of my stepped roof levels but I would also like a separate group for all columns however, the difficulty is that when I turn off all other other groups to show just the columns, Robot turns off all elements overlapping the two groups.
Our previous structural analysis program Microstran had a much better tool for doing this which allowed you to define groups not only be selection but by Section Numbers and Material (see screenshot below and screen capture video for further info).
This was a much more dynamic method as if for example, I had a group called say Column Type A all of which were Section Type 1, the group automatically updated whenever I changed the Section Number whereas in Robot, the only way I have found is to change the section number then manually add/remove the members to the groups.
I have looked through the help documentation and forums but could not find any references as to whether Robot possesses a similar capability.
@AnthonyMcTigue Artur Kosakowski marked post as the solution for better findability. If it did not work as an answer, please post your reply in this thread so that I can unmark the solution.
Solved! Go to Solution.
