CSA S16 Angle Effective area for class 4 sections

CSA S16 Angle Effective area for class 4 sections

gerhARD.BOTHMA
Explorer Explorer
768 Views
3 Replies
Message 1 of 4

CSA S16 Angle Effective area for class 4 sections

gerhARD.BOTHMA
Explorer
Explorer

The hand calculated value for class 4 section effective area is greater than Robot Effective area for AEP150x150x10:

Please advise how this is calculated.

gerhARDBOTHMA_0-1693474345365.png

gerhARDBOTHMA_1-1693474439227.png

 

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
769 Views
3 Replies
Replies (3)
Message 2 of 4

okapawal
Autodesk
Autodesk

Hi @gerhARD.BOTHMA 

I've checked your calculations for fy=350 MPa.  They seem reasonable.

I will ask development team for checking how it is calculated.

 



Waldemar Okapa

Software Quality Assurance & Testing Engineer
Message 3 of 4

Romanich
Mentor
Mentor

Hi @okapawal ,

 

Sorry for the off-topic, but is it possible to keep the class description in line with the CSA S16:19? For example. like in the picture above, it should be Class 4 instead of Slender.

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


0 Likes
Message 4 of 4

okapawal
Autodesk
Autodesk
Accepted solution

@gerhARD.BOTHMA 

There is a difference in using limited slenderness for angles legs "bel/t".
According CAN/CSA S16:19 it should be used limit bel/t = 250/sqrt(Fy) while RSA uses more conservative values bel/t = 200/sqrt(Fy).

 

It has been registered for correction.

 

 

 



Waldemar Okapa

Software Quality Assurance & Testing Engineer