Could there be a logical explanation why I am getting these asymmetries in deflection?

Could there be a logical explanation why I am getting these asymmetries in deflection?

yiviw97057
Advocate Advocate
544 Views
5 Replies
Message 1 of 6

Could there be a logical explanation why I am getting these asymmetries in deflection?

yiviw97057
Advocate
Advocate

I am looking at [-]Deflection(mm) after running calculations to find required reinforcement for slabs. However, in the middle I get asymmetries in the deflection cases, and I am not sure why. I tried to go through all the load cases I ran individually and look at Results - Maps - displacements for yy, but all cases looked fairly symmetrical compared to the picture below.

 

I also had to change all the load cases from SLS:CHR to SLS:QPR as suggested by a colleague, as otherwise I got unrealistic number. They said from previous experience that this helps somehow in Robot. 

 

Any suggestions would be much appreciated. 

 

 

1.PNG

0 Likes
545 Views
5 Replies
Replies (5)
Message 2 of 6

Romanich
Mentor
Mentor

Hi @yiviw97057 ,

 

Please attach the model. However, based on your screenshot I would recommend to check the assigned code parameters.

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


0 Likes
Message 3 of 6

yiviw97057
Advocate
Advocate

Thank you Romanich, I am not sure how comfortable I would be uploading it publicly, I could perhaps send it to your personal email. But nonetheless, could I ask what you mean by the assigned code parameters, is the link below what you're referring to?

 

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/robot-structural-analysis-professional/learn-explore/caas/Clo...

 

Or did you mean the design codes found under Job Preferences? Because they seem to be correct but I could triple check. Ive ran a lot of different combinations and they all made sense, it just seem to be this case when I run slab and shell reinforcement, and look at the [-]deflection.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 6

Romanich
Mentor
Mentor

Hi @yiviw97057 ,

Romanich_0-1635597593658.png

 

Romanich_1-1635597628557.png

 

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


0 Likes
Message 5 of 6

yiviw97057
Advocate
Advocate

Hi Romanich,

 

1.PNG

 

This is how mine looks. I am not sure what I should try; I tried to run with the highlighted red options "None", "For FE for which reinforcement As>0" and "For the whole panel", but I still get the same asymmetries in deflection. I am all out of ideas at this point, im open for any suggestions you might have. 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 6

Romanich
Mentor
Mentor

Hi @yiviw97057 ,

It is hard to say what is going on without having the model (at least the shown part). By the way, it seems that you have a quite big cover and small rebars. What is the thickness of the slab?

Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.

Roman Zhelezniak

Robot Evangelist & Passionate Civil Structural Engineer

LinkedIn | Robot & Хобот | App Store for Robot
EESignature


0 Likes