Beam instability

Beam instability

phi.sch
Contributor Contributor
1,298 Views
3 Replies
Message 1 of 4

Beam instability

phi.sch
Contributor
Contributor

Hi!

Hopefully someone can help me with this problem that I don't understand.

 

I have a structure with an roof that looks like the following below where there are HEA 160 pillars and HEA 160 connecting between the pillars with an IPE 220 laying on top of the pillars. The roofing consisting of thin sheetmetal is laying on the IPE beams. The type of sections in the picture below continues for ~20m. The IPE beam is attached to the HEA beams with 4 screws on each pillar as in the picture below.

 

151404836932159600_resized

 

The IPE beams can be seen in the picture below.

 

151404837151241500_resized

 

Where the structure standing on the beams are new as can be seen in blue below.

 

151404837497965900_resized

 

 

Between the web of the IPE beam where the structure is standing I have added 2 UPE beams.

 

151404837231980600_resized

 

 

But when I  try to run the buckling analysis I only get bad results on the stability.

 

151404885389450500_resized

151404885496263000_resized

 

With the following parameters.

 

151404886357124500_resizeda.

 

But if I change the buckling in Z and add an extra point in 0.4l I get the following results.

 

151404885598161800_resized

151404885565830900_resized

151404886538842200_resized

 

Should there be this large difference if I add an extra stabilizing in the Z-buckling on 0.4l? It is very far from where the load is attacking the structure.

 

Or am I going about this problem wrong since the beam is only attached on the flange?

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
1,299 Views
3 Replies
Replies (3)
Message 2 of 4

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @phi.sch

 

IMHO you should have set (internal) buckling Z restrains at the same locations as the ones for the lateral buckling.

 

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.

 

 



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 3 of 4

phi.sch
Contributor
Contributor

Thank you for the answer but can you please clarify why I should set the internal buckling at the same positions as the lateral buckling? 

 

Maybe the lateral buckling restraints are wrong too, I'm not sure how to set up the buckling analysis when the beam is only attached at one flange. The upper flange is almost free (only sheetmetal holding it in place) and the web is also free.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 4

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

Hi @phi.sch

 

I'd say that the columns and perpendicular beams which create a frame system can be treated as restrains against the buckling in the horizontal direction for these two beams. These beans will provide restrains against LTB for the flange they are bolted too as well. 

 

If one or more of these posts answered your question, please click Accept as Solution on the posts that helped you so others in the community can find them easily.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes