I'd like to actually chip in to this conversation as well. I have many quarrels with Revit as far as graphics go architecturally, but this one irks me quite a bit- (especially with leaders and dim ticks).
And before I get lit up about how I don't have to correct postscript drivers, or don't understand the CAD-to-Revit modality, I argue that even Adobe's (albeit limited) vector capabilities are even more involved. Both Photoshop and Illustrator allow for configuring end styles (via the pen tool) and ultimately when flattened / rasterized or plotted, it preserves the end styles without flaw.
Furthermore, for a software that costs almost twice as much as it's predecessor (ACAD), I am amazed that Revit doesn't come bundled with a dedicated print driver. (???) (In my experience I've found Autodesk's post-script drivers superior to Adobe's, but maybe there are better solutions?).
It's astonishing how a simple menu such as the plot configuration menu in ACAD exists, yet Revit has no such option to configure line terminations. Not to mention, the fact that you need to manage a plethora of line styles to achieve the various lines needed in details (membranes being a key one) can be cumbersome as you may require varying weights and patterns. And not to mention the turmoil you may put you BIM manager trying to keep track of all these varying line types.
I respect that Revit is more of a modelling software than a drafting one, and that the drawings it produces are generative, which is great but perhaps a more immersive VG override or line styles manager ought to be considered?
I suppose for now, the best solution is to outsource the drawings from ACAD in a drafting view to achieve the necessary drafting intent, but here's hoping they dial it back and provide some more immersive drafting tools.
Again, not here to hate on Revit, just fatigued from always finding workarounds (They literally have a website called 'wrw.is (what revit wants is[...])') to better convey my meaning.
