In order to be successful drafter, tech, or engineer, Revit is Not the only Application running on your PC.
MS Tools, Add in, Cloud based apps aka. google/edge browser tabs. I mean the list is there.
Believe me, many attempts have been taken, and the root cause of many issues is the platform on which Autodesk built Revit.
Obviously, by now you should have noticed, we are not dealing with "small project" user. We are dealing with Big Project users. Multifamily, Commercial, etc. RVT file in the range of 900MB.
Is Autodesk going to tell me, that my issue is Not Revit, but rather its me, my company running a large project with a descent size drafting team?
To add more: Revit offers "overalls" option, where you can make print packets and export them as a PDF document.
An appropriate Shop Packet, Print Packet, call it what you will, ranges between 30-40pgs.
Do you know? how much time it takes Revit to generate a 38page packet?
20min... On average. What is that all about?? During that time, Revit is untouchable. You press one key, and the screen shows "Not Responding" mode. If a company decides to put out 3 units a day of "whatever", that means, 3 packets a day. Do you see where I'm going with this? I'm rendered useless with Revit for 1hr in a given shift.
I mean guys, I'm putting down RAW feedback. Where is Autodesk? in improving Revit where it matters. PERFORMANCE. Capping to 16cores, still?? 64GB of RAM on deck and editing dimensions, STILL stalls with grayed out screen with hourglass?
I have to "gut out", turn off a BUNCH of layers in my VV settings, JUST so that I can orbit easily??
Do know what does to "clash detection" options?
I can go on. How about a case where 3rd party company gives (60) rvt files to one projects. Who does that? Or, should they do it, any ideas, WHY they are doing it that way?
I mean seriously, Autodesk needs to step up. Where 1gb rvt performance, SHOULD soly depend on users' hardware.
That way, users can give clear answers to their decision makers on what hardware to get