Parts of Beams or Columns overlap?

Parts of Beams or Columns overlap?

Anonymous
1,826 Views
4 Replies
Message 1 of 5

Parts of Beams or Columns overlap?

Anonymous
Not applicable

I'm trying to create a basic structure model to submit for analysis to the cloud, but when I try to submit to A360 I get this error message: "Parts of Beams or Columns overlap". Is there any way to make the ends of the trusses connect, but not overlap? 

 

no analysis 09.PNG

0 Likes
1,827 Views
4 Replies
Replies (4)
Message 2 of 5

dzanta
Mentor
Mentor

there are two models you need to verify when doing structural analysis (building model and analytical model).  verify the analytical model shows connections are clean and not overlapping...then verify the building model is good.


Dzan Ta, AEE, ASM, ACI.

EESignature



Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature


Autodesk Community | Twitter | YouTube | Facebook | LinkedIn |

Win 11 Pro/DELL XPS 15 9510/i9 3.2GHz/32GB RAM/Nvidia RTX 3050Ti/1TB PCIe SSD/4K 15.4" Non-Touch Display

0 Likes
Message 3 of 5

Anonymous
Not applicable

The truss tool automatically creates a vertical at the end if that's how the truss layout family was set up.  I'm not sure if Revit tries to be too smart and put a vertical in regardless but you can try editing the truss layout family to not have end verticals and assign that layout family to the minor trusses. 

 

You other option (manual) is to select the end vertical of the connecting truss (the one that frames into the larger one) and unpin it then delete it.  Unfortunately Revit my try to put it back in if you "touch" the truss in some way that would make it try to re-calculate itself. 

 

Best of luck.  You might want to take the "brute force" approach of creating the trusses and then "removing truss system" or whatever (same idea as exploding it) and then manage the elements yourself. 

 

I truly (and only a few people will understand how much) wish that this functionality was better for implementation of "real" trusses though the features of attach top/bottom and sketch top/bottom are so powerful that it's hard to not at least attempt to use them at first.

 

Good luck.

-Ken

 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 5

Anonymous
Not applicable
One more idea... you could set the end verticals of the trusses framing in to "non-structural" thereby turning off the analytical model and solving the symptom that your A360 model won't run.
0 Likes
Message 5 of 5

LyleHardin
Advisor
Advisor

We're having a similar issue with cross bracing. Many of our structures have Double, Double L bracing.

The analytical models show two lines on top of one another when we model the double, double L bracing.

I'm not sure what to do to separate the analytical lines.

Deleting one just doesn't seem right.

 

 

0 Likes