- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Hello,
I am using Revit 2022 to do a thermal analysis of a simple rectangular structure that results in a zone-load summary (cooling/heating). NB I am fairly new to Revit.
However when I change the insulation thickness of the external wall from 300 mm (R=6.5 (m2K)/W, U=0.15 W/(m2K)) to 600 mm (R=15.3 (m2K)/W, U=0.06 W/(m2K)) the Delayed Sensible Energy associated with the wall does not change at all for Heating and just 1W for Cooling.
Nevertheless, with such an increase in insulation thickness I was expecting to see a jump in the wall's Delayed Sensible Energy value... (see my questions at the end)
I am using "Use Building Elements" as the Energy Setting mode which to my understanding will allow the analysis to use the thermal material properties of the model elements (rather than fixed numbers from material tables).
The wall is made up of a typical set of inner, centre, and outer layers (poplar board, membrane, insulation, OSB, membrane, insulation, rain-screen)
Before doing an Analysis I delete the Analytical model and re-generate a new one because of the changes I made in the thickness of the insulation material.
I have defined 1 room which encompasses the entire interior space of the model. The room boundaries are touching the first interior layer of the wall as well as the floor and ceiling. My understanding is that the room is solely used to calculate the volume of the space.
Each wall, floor, and ceiling element has its "Room Bounding" set to true.
I have attached an image of the corresponding Analytical Space.
Hence a few questions...
1) Is it reasonable to expect a bigger jump in the wall's Delayed Sensible Energy value (due to insulation thickness increase)?
2) Is it right to assume that "Use Building Elements" mode will use the thermal properties of model elements like wall, floor, ceiling (rather than pre-set material values)?
3) I tried the "space/zone" mode (added a non-default zone + 1 space) but then I didn't see any change in the wall's energy value which made me conclude that pre-set material parameters were used rather than the material parameters of the model elements. Is this the correct assumption?
4) The fact that the room is merely touching the inner side of the wall... is that sufficient for doing the analysis or should the room know about the wall thickness and its composition? If so... how?
Any thoughts or pointers would be very welcome!
Many thanks, -Rene
Solved! Go to Solution.