Revit MEP Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit MEP Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit MEP topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Edit Family Symbols

16 REPLIES 16
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 17
Anonymous
3799 Views, 16 Replies

Edit Family Symbols

I am trying to modify the way a light fixture appears on my drawings.  It is a 4'X2' light fixture, but it appears that no matter how I edit the views in the family, it still appears as a 0'-6" X 4' rectangle.  I'm just wanting it to appear as it should, a 2'X4' rectangle. How to edit?  What am I missing?

16 REPLIES 16
Message 2 of 17
RobDraw
in reply to: Anonymous

Without the family, any answer would be a WAG.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 3 of 17
MuirEng
in reply to: RobDraw

You should be able to figure it out with by taking these steps:

 

in family editor select the family type you are having trouble with

open the ceiling plan view

set lower settings same as your project (scale, detail level)

turn on preview visibility

 

now you can debug it within the family editor.

good luck!

post the family if you are still having trouble.

 

 

 

Brian Muir, P.Eng, Muir Engineering
Message 4 of 17
MuirEng
in reply to: MuirEng

testing signature

Brian Muir, P.Eng, Muir Engineering
Message 5 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: MuirEng

Here are the families.  Also see attached family for a duplex receptacle.  I'm trying to just turn the symbol around to where the prongs face out instead of to the wall, and can't for the life of me get it to work right. 

Message 6 of 17
MuirEng
in reply to: Anonymous

I don't have time to look at all of these now, but I did look the light fixture. This family has some serious issues. Look at your 3d view in family editor and switch between types. Nothing changes. It is a 6" wide rectangle always. You need to draw n reference planes, dimension them, assign the dimensions to parameters, and then lock the geometry to those reference planes to create a 3d form that flexes with your family parameters.

 

There is a detail item loaded , presumably for plan view representation. I believe the consensus is that it is a bad idea to nest different family types together. This leads to weird behaviour in project with VG settings.

 

respectively, I suggest you need some training on family design. Try the Lynda course by Paul Aubin.

 

Our firm is planning to release content libraries for electrical engineers on a subscription basis. Is this of interest to you?

 

 

Brian Muir, P.Eng, Muir Engineering
Message 7 of 17
Secttor
in reply to: MuirEng

The sad part is that rfa's are saved in Revit 2018. 

Revit MEP - Electrical Certified Professional
Revit MEP - Mechanical Certified Professional

Draftworks.wordpress.com
Message 8 of 17
MuirEng
in reply to: Secttor

Yes, the OP will find it harder to obtain direct support on RFA files if they have used 2018 versus an older version.

Brian Muir, P.Eng, Muir Engineering
Message 9 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: MuirEng

What about the duplex receptacle?  Any ideas as to why it's impossible for me to rotate the way the symbol appears on the drawings?  It seems like the families that come with Revit have several issues.  I'm having a hard time figuring out why it's so difficult, I have to be missing something.  

Message 10 of 17
MuirEng
in reply to: Anonymous

I assume you are hosting this receptacle on a wall? If so you cannot rotate it. Otherwise you would rotate the electrical box out of the wall. Turn on fine view and see what I mean. If you host this family on a level then you can rotate it.

 

Here is your family with the symbol rotated. I did this by editing the nested generic annotation.

 

We use a symbol for receptacles that is symmetric. What's the value in showing the tails on one side or the other?

 

Brian Muir, P.Eng, Muir Engineering
Message 11 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: MuirEng

Awesome, I finally got it to happen!  Yes, the purpose of putting the tails out is, in our area, 99% of the time the architects and engineers prefer to see them facing out.  

 

A little background to what our scenario is, we took a training course in Revit a good while back and our first project just came through, so it has been little items here and there shutting down progress.  

Message 12 of 17
RobDraw
in reply to: MuirEng


@MuirEngwrote:

What's the value in showing the tails on one side or the other?

 


Not only has it been an industry standard, it actually has a basis in representing the device. Those "tails" represent the prongs of a plug.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 13 of 17
MuirEng
in reply to: Anonymous

Ok, good luck moving forward.
Brian Muir, P.Eng, Muir Engineering
Message 14 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: RobDraw

So, the big debate I have been seeing is which way to show the prongs, are you saying poking out or poking in is the industry standard?  Like I said, in our area standard is poking out (I will admit I'm a bit naive to what goes on outside of my little commercial market). 

Message 15 of 17
RobDraw
in reply to: Anonymous


@Anonymouswrote:

So, the big debate I have been seeing is which way to show the prongs, are you saying poking out or poking in is the industry standard?  Like I said, in our area standard is poking out (I will admit I'm a bit naive to what goes on outside of my little commercial market). 


As far as I'm concerned, there is no industry drafting standard. There are tons of them depending on the industry, location, personal preference, or any of a number of other factors.

 

Being from the MEP design side, the vast majority of the drawings that I've seen have them pointing towards the wall. Every electrical drawing that I've produced had them that way. So, your not showing the receptacle but rather the plug. The receptacle would be in the wall.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 16 of 17
MuirEng
in reply to: Anonymous

I have no interest in entering into a debate about what is best and what is
industry standard. I'll just leave it that we show a symmetric symbol and no
one has ever complained to us about this. The symbol is purely symbolic, and
easily modified, so you can do whatever you think is correct and per client
expectations.
Brian Muir, P.Eng, Muir Engineering
Message 17 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: MuirEng

Well thank y'all for your help!  Hopefully I can learn a good deal as I navigate the waters of Revit MEP.   

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Forma Design Contest


Autodesk Design & Make Report