Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
This feature would very useful, as some jurisdictions I work in have building height limitations and require a schedule showing roof heights over existing and proposed grades.
Thanks mpukas. Yes exactly, the local jurisdiction is requiring us to develop a schedule for our story plan. We had to manually type each elevation in excel to create a table with a numbering sequence for them to locate them easier. Please add your votes.
It would be nice to add edge points or placement points of any part to schedules. For example foundations, piles and other parts for staking-out at site. As you mentioned: A point naming mechanism is a must have for that. Preferable with a configurable naming rule system to group points logically.
Using a Dynamo script to read placement points, add them to attributes is dangerous, when moving parts and not updating the coordinates by a rerun of the Dynamo script.
When coordinates are accessible for schedule creation, coordinates would automatically update in the schedule when a part is moved. Schedule Filters would reduce the parts seen for these schedules.
Alternative/Additional way would be an annotation family for survey points with a definable point number/name.
A plan based filter for these points shown on a plan. Or a reference to a view to obtain survey points shown in that view.