Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
As you know, rebar shapes are currently defined with intervals for that angle: 0<Angle<90; Angle = 90; 90<Angle<180 deg. Whether or not the angle flexes when you drag the grips, depends on it having either an angle constraint or some orthogonal dimension constraints, in the shape family.
If the variation would be 0 < Angle < 180, then any shape with 3 segments would report as the same shape. Would this be what you would find useful? Or, maybe the ability to choose from the list of shapes that match?
I understand that this is problematic topic because at least in Finland we have only two three segmented shapes where start and end segments are pointing into the same direction: D with 90 degree bends and then E with variable bends.
These two bars are the same shape but still goes to a different row in our bar bending schedule because the angle differs.
It's worth of thinking if each user could decide the bend interval by their needs or at least be able to override the shape according to the standards of own country.
