Announcements
Welcome to the Revit Ideas Board! Before posting, please read the helpful tips here. Thank you for your Ideas!
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Project and Field Formatting MBH Units

Project and Field Formatting MBH Units

MBH is a standard unit of measurement for energy analysis and having it as an option as a native unit would simplify schedules by knocking off some unneeded zeros.

6 Comments
Evan.S.Hall
Enthusiast

You can also report MBH from a calculated field that equals your actual capacity divided by 1,000 Btu/h. The data type for the calculated field needs to be Number. Then, either have a "working schedule" and a "document schedule" or just hide and unhide the actual capacity field as needed. Not very elegant, but it allows you to report MBH on paper and still have an accurate capacity in the model.

 

MBH conversion.JPG

 

But, I agree, such workarounds should not be necessary to simply report MBH which is an industry standard unit for many equipment types. Not a lot of support for this one yet, but seems like it could be a quick fix.

Anonymous
Not applicable

The downside to this method is that you lose the units associated with the number. 

Anonymous
Not applicable

Still wishing I didn't have to use calculated fields...

crapai
Advocate

How is this still not a thing? Why does this have such few votes? Isn't this something literally every mechanical designer needs to work around?

Evan.S.Hall
Enthusiast

@crapai I have two guesses at why this has so few votes still...

 

1) I think a small percentage of mechanical designers are trying to leverage the benefits of using actual units in their Revit data. Many aren't putting this data in anyway because they aren't using Revit schedules. Those that are using Revit schedules often just use a number data type for the fields they need.

 

2) An even smaller percentage of mechanical designers would take the time to to vote on a forum when their "work around's" get them by.

 

Additionally, those that do vote for the addition of some data type are diffuse. Notice all the different posts dealing with a similar topic in the linked post: https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/add-custom-type-of-parameters-units-and-or-unit-symbols/i...

 

crapai
Advocate

@Anonymous

All great points. I'm wondering to what extent designers not using data leads to not caring about unit types verse having lackluster unit types leads to not using data.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea  

Autodesk Design & Make Report