Announcements
Welcome to the Revit Ideas Board! Before posting, please read the helpful tips here. Thank you for your Ideas!
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Phasing of text

Phasing of text

We work on a lot of projects where we plan future phases of development. Rooms and room tags are easily phased, but standard text can not. 

An option to phase text would be fantastig

13 Comments
f_coulombe2
Participant

We often work in renovation projects. With Autocad, we would use layers for existing components, other layers for demolished components and an other group for new components. The existing components would be used in the demoilition and construction phase.

 

Different options are available in Revit to do this kind of drawings, but it would be very pratical to use the phases in the detail view to manage the different construction steps.

dplumb_BWBR
Advisor

 With Autocad, you use layers for existing components,

With Revit, you use different Views with different Phase Filters

f_coulombe2
Participant
I understand the phase filters concepts for models. It would be very
practical that the phase filters can be applied to all 2d objects
(annotation families, lines).
dplumb_BWBR
Advisor

Frankly, I don't see the point.

Annotations are View-specific. If you don't want to see an annotation, don't put it in the View

If you're changing Phases within a single View, yo're using Revit wrong.

f_coulombe2
Participant
Hi everyone,

it seems that I did not explain clearly the objective of my idea. I am
looking for a simple procedure to create independent views for the same
detail in different construction phases. I would like to be able to see the
same lines and 2d objects in different views just like I do with x-ref in
Autocad.

When I work on a renovation project in autocad, I start by drawing the
existing construction detail by using the model and adding lines of
different types and 2d objects to complete the details. Usually the detail
is drawn with continuous lines with a gray solid hatch. I use this detail to
create the demolition detail by changing the lines of the demolished
components in hidden type line and removing the solid hatch. The demolition
detail is obviously coordinated with the construction detail. The demolition
is used in x-ref in the construction pages so that I don't have to draw the
detail twice. If I change something in the demolition detail, the changes
show in the construction detail.

I would like to find a simple procedure in Revit. I understand that I can
use the comments parameter for 2d objects to filter what I want to see, but
it is more complicated for lines.

Since the phase parameter exists, I think that it is a good idea to use it
for all types of drawing elements since it is a filter that already exists
in Revit.

Thanks for all your comments
TudorBeachApt
Contributor

I believe that text should be on a Phase and Not View Specific.

 

Consider that you have designed the ultimate plan set with all of the bells and whistles. Now you desire to scale the project back to cut costs or for any other reasons. If you have a 100 or more views of the ultimate design this means that you now have to duplicate these views and the sheets they are on to obtain the scaled back design. Then you need to delete the text that no longer applies and hope that you get it all right. What do you do if you made a mistake or what it another way? The amount of effort required is inconceivable!

 

Then if you want an in-between design you will again have to duplicate all of the views and sheets again. This seems to be a very unreasonable way to achieve simple variations in the design.

 

Wouldn’t it be more efficient to just change the text that labels an item to the same phase of the item? It is true that you will need to change the Phase of the 100 views to the achieve the result. However, the Sheets these views are on could remain as they are and you wouldn’t end up with hundreds of duplicates.

TudorBeachApt
Contributor

I made the following statement:

 

I believe that text should be on a Phase and Not View Specific.

 

I would like to correct that statement to read as follows:

 

I believe that text should also be on a Phase and Not just View Specific.

 

I understand the value of text and annotation being view specific. If text and annotation were also on a Phase then the goal that I stated could be achieved.

TudorBeachApt
Contributor

I am attaching three images to exemplify the outcome that I wish could be accomplished with phase specific text. The images are from just one of several views of a whole house water filtration system.


Image 1 is Design 1 which is the All Out Design that contains a water meter. The meter is on a phase. The text is not on a phase as how Revit currently functions.


Image 2 is Design 2 which is the Scaled Back Design that eliminates the water meter by changing the view’s phase. However, the text not being on the same phase remains in the view.


If the text label for the meter was on the same phase as the meter then simply changing the view’s phase would quickly and precisely make the view show the desired design as in Image 3.


If Revit had phase specific text there would be no need for duplicate views and sheets to deal with various design options.Image 1.jpgImage 2.jpgImage 3.jpg

Douglas.Cooper
Explorer

I am running into this on a project this morning.  I have set up equipment and piping for a project, but the scope has changed.  So now I am setting a good bit of the equipment to a future phase, but I have to manually hide each piece of text, which no one will likely see when we move to the future phase - but the equipment will show up once the phase is progressed.

Yien_Chao
Advisor

if you have phases, you also should have view for each phase. why the need to have phase for text beside?

Mike.FORM
Advisor

This request does not make sense. As @Yien_Chao said you should have views for each phase and if you have text it should only exist in that view.

 

You also state rooms and room tags are easily phased. Those 2 items currently cannot be phased, they only exist in the phase they are created, they do not pass through one phase to another.

 

Are you trying to say you want the ability to place text as some sort of modeled annotation that appears in all views of the same type for that phase?

colinqBYUV9
Enthusiast

I have made a Multi-catagory tag with shared parameters that does something similar to what you want (I think). The tag has three types - Existing, Demo, New. The shared parameters are added to the project and assigned to all model categories.

 

There are 6 shared parameters -

1- Existing Text (type)

2- Existing Text Additional (Instance) 

3- Demo Text (type)

4- Demo Text Additional (Instance) 

5- New Text (type)

6- New Text Additional (Instance) 

 

Now in the project I can tag any item with a multi-catagory tag and assign the text at a type level and additional text to any instance of that type. I just add different text to each phase as required. It doesn't have the controllability of a text box but it works ok in most situations and if I need to change any of the text it updates globally.

 

anDZVBY
Explorer

Hello, I would be glad if there was a way to change the color of labels using phase overwriting.
e.g. as a switch parameter for the respective view
o Label color by style
o Label color by phase


See appendix for illustration.

anDZVBY_1-1728468524263.png

 

Another option would be to display the phase of the base part as a global property parameter for labels. And then to read this parameter using a filter and to overwrite the label color using a filter.

 
Until now, you either had to create a separate label for each color or you had to overwrite the individual labels in the respective view. Neither is very convenient and is often forgotten when changes are made.

 

 

 

 

 

Tags (3)

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea  

Autodesk Design & Make Report