Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
In schedule conditional formatting, we should be able to use multiple conditions using the same field. (i.e. 0 fc = red, 1-20 fc = yellow, etc.) Currently to have multiple rules, you have to reference different fields.
How is this still not a thing? Even the wording in the conditional formatting dialogue indicates that you should be able to have multiple conditions... come on dev team, this must surely be an easy win?? 😁
It is crazy how in Revit 2022, you can't still add multiple conditions to highlight different elements in the schedules. I have multiple room types that need to be color coded according to the floor plan color scheme and is not possible.
Why so impatient everyone? It's only been six years. Writing software is hard and Autodesk has limited resources and money ... actually no, wait, they are a huge software company with high profit.
But seriously, I don't think they should fiddle with these conditional behaviour systems one at a time. I hope they are working quietly to bring one unified system to the many parts of Revit where some conditions are possible. The Filter system for "Filters" is pretty good. But it's a different one for Conditional Formatting, and other possibilities in Calculated Formulas. A unified system would be great.
Here was my work around for a quasi if/then statement. I shade the column "green" to start. (if). Then my test turns my condition to "red" and this overrides.
