在revit中材质提取的面积和体积的量中存在错误，不准确，墙与墙、墙与柱、墙与梁、墙与板、建筑墙与结构墙等等这些扣减以及计算规则中都存在很大的不准确性。 Show More

现在revit默认的连接时板扣除墙、柱、梁。以及其他的扣除，但是这个默认都不能项目上进行更改，造成一定的困扰，比如砌体墙到板底部、梁底部，结构墙需要到板顶部。如果通过第三方插件去完成，会导致项目文件增大、软件反应过慢，导致项目编辑卡顿。如果不用第三方的插件就只能在创建模型的时候一个一个的修改连接方式，这是一种十分耗时的方式。revit中的连接方式以及扣减规则直接影响的明细表中的量，对量的准确性影响很大。建筑和结构之间也应该有扣减和连接关系，比如建筑墙（不参与受力分析）与结构墙（参与受力分析）不应该存在连接，结构墙应该扣除建筑墙。结构的优先级大于建筑的优先级，比如建筑构件不能对结构构件形成连接和扣减，比如建筑墙体穿过结构柱时，结构柱自动将建筑墙体扣减。并且同材质的面层形成剪切，比如墙柱采用的同材质抹灰和面层，那么这个面层就剪切。同样建筑墙与结构墙也一样。框架结构（梁）的底部与侧面的面层呢？如果revit能增加一个装饰的系统族（这个建议我以前提过）那么这个问题也解决了，同时也能和其他的面层形成连接和剪切关系。同时也希望面层能够跟随洞口（墙体洞口、板洞口）添加。这样门窗位置的面层也能够得到统计。还有建议在族的可见性设置中能设置显示规程，在什么规程中显示。这样就不会在结构规程中显示门窗以及一些家具等等。 Show More

I and many of us would love to be able to combine hatch patterns with screen colors for model components like walls... I have not been able to find a way of doing this.   Specifically we would like to show concrete walls with a concrete hatch pattern and also a gray tone.   Show More

So, even though I am using a 16 core processor and a high end graphics card, when I manipulate 3D with trees visible  (I am working on an oak tree covered lot and it is essential to preserve as many as possible), it is, to say the least, less than smooth. Hiding the landscaping in the view works of course, but I am wondering if it would be possible to have a window with a stripped down version of VG, with just a few selected categories, of even items, that I can float on any screen (actually maybe one for each screen) so that I can quickly turn them on or off . I wouldn't imagine that would be too complicated, in fact it might already be there and I just haven't found it. Let me know. Show More

In a similar way to AutoCAD sheet sets, why we don’t have the same option in Revit? Idea: I want to have an option to display Revit sheets the same way the print setups are (i.e. Black lines) Summary: Our template is based on displaying model elements/annotations in views/sheets with matching colors to AutoCAD layers to make it familiar when switching between the two programs.  These colors make it confusing when linking marked up DWF back to Revit and definitely redlines will be viewed better if the background sheet is set to Black lines by one single click like in the other program. Show More

When exporting to CAD for example facades with trees or cars etc.  we have cut holes in shape of those objects. It would be nice to have possibilities to delete them or switch off layer but main object like façades should stay intact. Show More

When exporting to cad divided as dependent views (sheets) drawing is physically cued in CAD. It is very inconvenient because we have to always export 3rd drawing where elements are all together. Better solution would be to mask or just position exactly in layout needed part of drawing but leave all elements. Show More

If there was a way to keep the corresponding phase line weight for piping below the view range, that would be stellar. Whenever I am drawing piping below the floor/slab (bc architects don't always want to have a foundation plan, or provide a foundation for the model), I have to manually select pipes/fittings and override the line weight for new construction vs existing. This can be cumbersome for large jobs. Show More

Improve Wall Joins changing: Allow user change the wall join by drag location point of wall, instead of click on command Wall Joins. By dragging the location point of a wall to any edge of a wall join, for example: join of 3 walls, the geometry of that wall will be priority than 02 other walls. This function may ONLY CAN work for "rectangle" join.    Show More

经测试 填色功能虽然能单独给模型的某一个面赋予材质，但致命的是这种操作导致材质面积统计有严重差异，这是个很严重的问题，望改善！随着BIM技术对装饰领域的影响越来越大，建议完善更多用于室内装饰的功能！ 如图 这个模型只有一个面有材质，但是面积竟然有5.7平方，显然是不符合实际的，实际工作中，很多构建是计算单面面积的，而不是把模型6个面都加起来，这对于室内装饰计算材料展开面积非常重要，当然不限于横平竖直的，还有很多异性曲面等造型需要优化软件功能 Show More

Option to maintain the System line position with the SMLX Transfer, as set by user,  when using Dynamic profile and standard profile combined exchanges.   Using the AS Extension in Revit to Create the SMLX file for import into AS,  notice that if the dynamic profile option is selected,  then the System line position is  changed from say the top back to the Analytical position.    This position is the centre of gravity location within AS.  For example if you have Standard profiles that use the one to one mapping rules,  without the dynamic option checked under the Extensions settings  dialog, the profile is transferred and keeps the System line position as set,   for example to the top of the beam.   But if you check the dynamic option, then the system line is moved to the Analytical centre, although it appears the object body does not move. ( this is default for the help page over what is transferred)   Typically Steel models will have a combination of Standard profiles and custom profiles,  therefore if dynamic is selected then this will override the one to one method for all sections in the model, moving the System line reference.  This can cause issue with further operations inside AS, for placement of contours, macro elements and then creation of parts and assemblies from drawing styles.   Therefore,  can the Extension be adapted to create the system line reference as set to Top or bottom etc . During the transfer.   So that when you send the elements back and forth between platforms, there is no change in the system line position , it is stored inside the SMLX file.   Sure there is a similar option inside the link between advance steel and Robot SA,  you can change the beam size, but the system line is maintained in robot as set,  the analytical centre moves relative to the beam size Show More

I'm modelling an existing building in detail. For this reason, I have lots of different references in multiple views. I wish I could screenshot the measurements with the square selection and temporally recall them when needed near my cursor. Show More

If the linked model is a central model, you can open this link without unloading from the current project by creating a local file. It would be very convenient if the context menu of the link contained such a command. See attached picture   Show More

What if Revit had a radio button on the quick access toolbar that was a simple on off radio button that when off did not allow editing of families.  Then when we are editing objects like Room Tags we will not accidentally click into the tag family and waist time opening that family only to waist time closing it over and over again.   Show More

Using a Kinect tm camera or similar component, capture the 3D image data from a space and use tracking algorithm to mathematically interpret and reconstruct the data into construction elements. This process will reproduce the 2D or 3D layouts information content in a format readable from Revit. The whole concept is to reproduce non-existing plans from old buildings or spaces without the use of expensive capturing and measuring equipment.   Show More

Hi   In Revit Conceptual massing, there are some important points i think are a must to be considered in the next versions:                 * when create the mass, and load into project, all the mass is considered as conceptual, only the panels or adaptive models are working as final elements, even if i need a surface to act as a final object or item.                   * when load a generic model adaptive or any to the mass file, it can not be cuttable, also when load the mass into the project.   i hope these points can be solved.   many thanks regards,   Show More