La sugerencia automática le ayuda a obtener, de forma rápida, resultados precisos de su búsqueda al sugerirle posibles coincidencias mientras escribe.
Mostrando los resultados de
Mostrar solo
|
Buscar en lugar de
Quiere decir:
Esta página se tradujo para tu conveniencia mediante un servicio de traducción automática. No es una traducción oficial, y puede contener errores o traducciones imprecisas. Autodesk no garantiza, ni expresa ni implícitamente, la precisión, la confiabilidad ni la exhaustividad de la información traducida por el servicio de traducción automática y no será responsable por los daños o las pérdidas que se produzcan como consecuencia de la confianza depositada en dicho servicio.Traducir
Another great idea that has been under review for over 3 years. What is the point of having a Revit Ideas board if things just get put under perpetual review. Surely after 3 years some direction must be apparent. Why are we paying subscriptions when basic multi-discipline platform ideas are just ignored for years at a time.
The new Revit Public Roadmap has been posted (here) but the idea is once again not mentioned anywhere, meaning it will take a while longer for it to be implemented. When can we finally expect this idea to show up on the roadmap?
@harlan_brumm (or anyone from Autodesk) four years ago back in 2016 you told us you would provide us with an update on this issue. I feel like we have been very patient so can you let us know if Autodesk is actually doing anything with this or if your response was just a cut and paste response to make us feel like we are being listened to.
every time you need to create a key schedule you need to create new parameters as you cannot use shared parameters. this adds to the endless list of project parameters.
i dont know how this is not DEFAULT ?!?!?! aaand for multiple categories, how about? for example Wall Floors Beams together on one list. when come to concrete for example (C30/37, XC1 W0).. common parameters . i dont need 3 separate tables. this is ridiculous!