Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
Please don't shout and, most importantly, don't double post. (Capital letters means shouting). It's not nice. We all have/had frustrations at times using Revit. Nobody's perfect. Not even Revit.
The whole project has either AWG or mm² wire settings depending on which region's software version you are using.
The mm² version of the software is broken, voltage drop doesn't work and hasn't worked for years. The annotation of three phase circuits is backwards and the way it displays circuit conductors is non-standard. Basically it's all junk.
@scott_dakin Is there a post somewhere that details all those issues? It might help to show some screenshots of what it looks like now and what it should look like (and maybe also comparing the AWG vs mm² versions). I have no idea what you're talking about (I'm structural), and the developers probably don't either... BTW, is that a hard-coded issue? or is it just a function of the default templates that ship with Revit (i.e. if a project created with an AWG version is opened by a mm² version, would it still show the AWG? or mm²)?
It sounds like the voltage-drop thing is a bug - did you try support? I know they redirect us here all the time when the software is working "as designed", but you never know (I've actually had some bugs make it through to the development team that way - miracle of miracles).
