Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Why can I change one dimension, but not the other one?

12 ANTWORTEN 12
GELÖST
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 13
stefanome
696 Aufrufe, 12 Antworten

Why can I change one dimension, but not the other one?

In this screencast you can see that I can successfully select one horizontal line and change the vertical dimension, but I can't select one vertical line and change the horizontal dimension.

 

What am I doing wrong?

12 ANTWORTEN 12
Nachricht 2 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: stefanome

Label the Dimension and change the Parameter Value.  

Nachricht 3 von 13
stefanome
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Thanks, I know I can do that, and I have found other workarounds too.

 

But I would like to understand why this is happening, because I keep getting in this situation and looking for workarounds.

 

I'm sure there is a better way than keeping doing something, finding out that 50% of the times it doesn't work and looking for a workaround.

Nachricht 4 von 13
GustavoUbriaco
als Antwort auf: stefanome

there is something blocking those lines 

check these images in this case the dimension is locked, not on your case maybe the EQ is the problem? what happens if you put a label parameter in that dimension?

ubriacocontrerasgustavo_1-1615406216029.png

ubriacocontrerasgustavo_2-1615406241147.png

 

 

 

Gustavo Ubriaco Contreras
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Nachricht 5 von 13
stefanome
als Antwort auf: GustavoUbriaco

Adding a label works fine. I can change the value from the Family Types dialog and it works as expected. As soon as I set the label back to <none> it stops working.

 

If I get out of the editor I see a 3" dimension instead of the 6" one:

stefanomenci_0-1615406609934.png

Nachricht 6 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: stefanome


@stefanome wrote:

Thanks, I know I can do that, and I have found other workarounds too.

 

But I would like to understand why this is happening, because I keep getting in this situation and looking for workarounds.

 

I'm sure there is a better way than keeping doing something, finding out that 50% of the times it doesn't work and looking for a workaround.


 

"Workaround"? What I told you to do is not a "Workaround".  It's the only way you can do it with that EQ constraint.  If you remove the EQ Constraint, you can change the Dimension.  You can also select the Right or Left Ref Plane (if accessible) and change the Temporary Dimension for the half-width.  

Nachricht 7 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: stefanome

FWIW: I would advise against putting control dims in sketch mode.  Instead, align and lock sketch linework to Ref. Planes that are visible outside of sketch mode and then pull labeled dimension between Ref. Planes.  

Nachricht 8 von 13
GustavoUbriaco
als Antwort auf: stefanome

click and drag the line in my computer happens some similar and now it is working

Gustavo Ubriaco Contreras
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Nachricht 9 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: stefanome

Have you considered Aligning and Locking to Ref. Planes?  It not a "Workaround". Promise.  :zwinkerndes_Gesicht:

Nachricht 10 von 13
stefanome
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

"Workaround"? What I told you to do is not a "Workaround".  It's the only way you can do it with that EQ constraint.  If you remove the EQ Constraint, you can change the Dimension. 

That's weird. What is the logic behind it? Is this a documented behavior?

 

I'm coming from other 3D modeling software similar to Inventor, where duplicating an entity in a sketch is just confusing. If a line in your sketch can be constrained, then you should constrain that without creating any redundant entities.

 

Sometimes I think that knowing other parametric 3D software is preventing me from thinking the Revit way. Is there any Inventor-to-Revit guide that lists the dos and don'ts?

Nachricht 11 von 13
lucdoucet_msdl
als Antwort auf: stefanome

@stefanome 

 


That's weird. What is the logic behind it? Is this a documented behavior?


Welcome to the wonderful world of Revit's parametric constraint ecosystem! There is some specific documentation as per this aptly named help ressource:  Constraints

 

I'm coming from other 3D modeling software similar to Inventor, where duplicating an entity in a sketch is just confusing. If a line in your sketch can be constrained, then you should constrain that without creating any redundant entities.

There is a category in Revit called "implied" constraints that are a result of the way you create the geometry. The simplest example of this is:

  1. a line parallel to a reference plane with a dimension string that controls it's distance from the reference plane;
  2. mirror that line about the reference plane and this second line will move towards and away from the reference plane as though there exists an "equality" dimension string.

Here is a link to the different types of constraints that Revit presents : Types of Constraints

 

Sometimes I think that knowing other parametric 3D software is preventing me from thinking the Revit way. 


Having also used other parametric CAD/CAM software, I agree that you need to avoid analogies as to the way other software work. Analogies may work in a poetic sense but will lead you astray when you try to used them in a logical problem.

 

In reviewing your screen cast, I would suggest you activate the "Reveal Constraints" mode to troubleshoot.

lucdoucet_msdl_0-1615431868796.png

Then again, I may be that you are constraining something in sketch mode that would rather be constrained outside the sketch environement.

 

Good luck,

 

-luc

Nachricht 12 von 13
stefanome
als Antwort auf: lucdoucet_msdl

Thank you very much!
Nachricht 13 von 13
GustavoUbriaco
als Antwort auf: lucdoucet_msdl

Exellent information! thank you @lucdoucet_msdl !

Gustavo Ubriaco Contreras
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report