Hello,
Wall layers are not joining correctly, why?
Same walls, with same height, with same parameters?
Pictures:
Gelöst! Gehe zur Lösung
Gelöst von RDAOU. Gehe zur Lösung
You probably placed them with "Disallow Joins"...select the wall and click the T sign to re-allow Join
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
I think it was visual bug,
I just simply clicked on wall and selected "Select Joined Elements" then every wall fixed it self...
I didn't even save file after fixing, next time opening it all was already fixed.
No it is not a graphics glitch ...You are using Unlocked Layers with Base extension.... On the Ribbon
Or Alternatively:
NOTE: If you disable Join on both walls >>> You will need to manually invoke Join Geometry tool
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
Yes you are right, that wasn't glitch. Some how I adjusted a bit wall layers, and then pressed "Select all wall" I think that refreshed all lines and I though that that was visual glitch. In that other post I found what caused that.
Here what caused it and also fix (for people with similar issue):
Oh so it was glitch, I simply used "Select Joined Elements" and it's fixed all walls.
That's not a glitch. It is the normal behavior of unlocked layers ever since that feature was there (I remember it dates back to 2009). That link to the incident is dated 2016, I wonder in Barth actually believes it is still under investigation!!!
There are 4 other workaround that article fails to mention, the most basic of which is Converting the walls to parts
PS: Please mark any of his replies as a solution...
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
LMAO! You get riled up so easily, @RDAOU! Now you are all worked up about my use of the word "glitch" (in scare quotes)??? Geez. Next, it will probably be my use of the acronym BIM. Oh wait; we've already been there and done that.
Take a nap dude. Maybe ease up on the meds too.
@barthbradley wrote:LMAO! You get riled up so easily, @RDAOU! Now you are all worked up about my use of the word "glitch" (in scare quotes)??? Geez. Next, it will probably be my use of the acronym BIM. Oh wait; we've already been there and done that.
Take a nap dude. Maybe ease up on the meds too.
What caught my attention was the link not your reply and not how/what you punctuate, the latter are of no relevance. In addition to what has been already mentioned, the link suggests 4 workaround (not solutions) 2 of which I also do not believe are suitable for a workaround:
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
Sorry, never meant to start a war, between you guys.
Nah no war there ... that is just Barth's way of flirting
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.