
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
I would really love to see some better site development functionality (topography modelling)
Trying to do a graded region where you can implement a building pad to only cut away the topo above the specified height of the building pad, but anything below that building pad height just remains the existing topography height.
Ie. Cut only graded region option, not cut and fill (which the building pad does)
The point heights are really painstaking and frustrating to work with. I often experience the "place point" - "relative to surface" function to be inaccurate. Where I would place relative points around the perimeter of the building to retain the existing heights of the topo, and then follow that with the desired cut height inside the perimeter of those relative points. Problem is that those relative points would often change the existing height of the area where I place the point height slightly.
There are a lot of buildings we design that are built on piled foundations (floating timber buildings) where the joists need to be min. 450m above ground level, (NZ code) thus requiring a gradient cut, but not a fill.
Does anyone have suggestions to achieve accurate topo model for the above?
Solved! Go to Solution.