Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Set out dimensions to come from inside of walls

13 ANTWORTEN 13
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 14
woodstim
5056 Aufrufe, 13 Antworten

Set out dimensions to come from inside of walls

Hi,

 

When I'm modelling a floorplan, I want to enter my pre measured dimensions from wall to wall. But Revit seems to want to measure from the centre of the walls. So I have to figure out the wall thickness and take it into account to get the wall to wall dimension. Can this be set up to go from inside wall to inside wall. I'm not meaning the dimensioning style for a finished drawing, but the dimension Revit produces when setting out walls etc and you can enter your length into.

 

See screenshot attached.

 

Thanks,

 

Tim.

13 ANTWORTEN 13
Nachricht 2 von 14
Ilic.Andrej
als Antwort auf: woodstim

What you re writing of is called temporary dimension. To set up a temporary dimension, all you have to do is click on one of its ends, move around the wall and click Tab. This will toggle between the center of the wall, the exterior and the interior face of the wall. The approach is the same for other categories.

 

Untitled.png



Andrej Ilić

phonetical: ændreɪ ilich
MSc Arch

Autodesk Expert Elite Alumni

Nachricht 3 von 14
woodstim
als Antwort auf: Ilic.Andrej

Thanks. This seems tedious to do every time. Is there a way to set it up to default to inside of wall?

Tim.
Nachricht 4 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: woodstim

TD2.png

 

Find at Manage=>Additional Settings=>Temporary Dimensions

Nachricht 5 von 14
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: woodstim

Temporary Dimension settings.

 

Annotation 2019-06-05 140521.png

Nachricht 6 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

I wish I thought of that.  

 

Oh wait; I did.

 

Nice repackaging -- and coat-tail riding.  Again.  

Nachricht 7 von 14
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

25-Funny-Salty-meme-6

Nachricht 8 von 14
Ilic.Andrej
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

Hey guys, stop arguing! We can do this! Maybe this is a solution!

 

Untitled.jpg



Andrej Ilić

phonetical: ændreɪ ilich
MSc Arch

Autodesk Expert Elite Alumni

Nachricht 9 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Ilic.Andrej

...or, if you can't beat 'em -- join 'em.  Change Plan Note.

 

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

 

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF FINISHED WALL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.  

 

Smiley (zwinkernd)

 

...always seemed strange to me that the default is Wall Center. Autodesk has obviously never laid a chalk line in it's life. 

Nachricht 10 von 14
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: barthbradley


@barthbradley wrote:

...always seemed strange to me that the default is Wall Center. Autodesk has obviously never laid a chalk line in it's life. 


Was like that before Autodesk I believe...

Nachricht 11 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Anonymous


@Anonymous wrote:

@barthbradley wrote:

...always seemed strange to me that the default is Wall Center. Autodesk has obviously never laid a chalk line in it's life. 


Was like that before Autodesk I believe...


 

 

What was?  

Nachricht 12 von 14
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

The temporary dimension default...was like that before Autodesk bought Revit.

Nachricht 13 von 14
loboarch
als Antwort auf: barthbradley


@barthbradley wrote:

 

 

...always seemed strange to me that the default is Wall Center. Autodesk has obviously never laid a chalk line in it's life. 


I have a feeling this might be regional preferences. I have heard some people swear by centerlines, others by finish face, others by face of one side of stud, others both sides nominal, etc...

 

When i was on a job site a long time ago as a young intern Architect (20 or more yrs now) I asked the job site supervisor how it was "supposed" to be done. he told me he does not really care as long as it all works out and adds up correctly. 



Jeff Hanson
Principal Content Experience Designer
Revit Help |
Nachricht 14 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: loboarch

I’m talking about multi-layered wall types. I can understand core face and core center wall justifications on placement.  I can even understand finished face wall justification on placement (think minimum clearance codes).  What is odd to me is finished wall center on placement as the default. Who in the AEC community has ever out walls that way?  

   

But I will say, the Centerline justification is critical if you need to flip wall orientations after laying them out “properly” – especially if you’ve pulled permanent dimensions from core face, core center or finish face.  Maybe that's Autodesk's reasoning behind the Centerline default.  

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report